My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
sbend
>
Public
>
Inclusive Procurement and Contracting Board (MBE/WBE)
>
Reports
>
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2020 1:57:54 PM
Creation date
11/3/2020 1:55:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of South Bend Disoarity Study 2020 <br />rates for business loans; minority-owned firms receive smaller equity <br />investments than non -minority owned firms even when controlling for <br />detailed business and owner characteristics; and minority entrepreneurs <br />face challenges (including lower family wealth and difficulty penetrating <br />financial markets and networks) directly related to race that limit their <br />ability to secure financing for their businesses. <br />• Results from the Federal Reserve Board's Small Business Credit Surveys <br />form 2016 and 2018. These Surveys found significant barriers to minority <br />and woman -owned firms seeking commercial credit, especially for Black - <br />owned firms. For example, Black -owned firm application rates for new <br />funding were 10 percentage points higher than White -owned firms but <br />their approval rates were 19 percentage points lower. Further, Black - <br />owned firms were nearly twice as likely to be turned down completely <br />compared to White -owned businesses. <br />• The literature on barriers to access to the development of human capital. <br />This research reports that minorities continue to face constraints on their <br />entrepreneurial success based on race. These constraints negatively <br />impact the ability of firms to form, to grow, and to succeed. <br />These types of evidence have been found by the courts to be relevant and pro- <br />bative of whether a government will be a passive participant in overall market- <br />place discrimination without some type of affirmative intervention. Taken <br />together with anecdotal data, this is the type of proof that addresses whether, <br />in the absence of M/WBE contract goals, the City will be a passive participant <br />in the discriminatory systems found throughout its industry market. These <br />economy -wide analyses are relevant and probative to whether the City may <br />employ narrowly tailored race- and gender -conscious measures to ensure <br />equal opportunities to access its contracts and associated subcontracts. <br />4. Qualitative Evidence of Race and Gender Barriers in the City's <br />Market <br />In addition to quantitative data, the courts look to anecdotal evidence of firms' <br />marketplace experiences to evaluate whether the effects of current or past <br />discrimination continue to impede opportunities for M/WBEs such that race - <br />conscious measures by the agency are supportable. <br />To explore this type of anecdotal evidence, we received input from 110 partic- <br />ipants. Many minority and woman owners reported that they continue to <br />encounter discriminatory attitudes, stereotypes and negative perceptions of <br />their qualifications, professionalism and/or capabilities. While sometimes sub- <br />tle, these biases about minorities' and women's lack of competence infect all <br />aspects of their attempts to obtain contracts and to be treated equally in per - <br />10 © 2020 Colette Holt & Associates, All Rights Reserved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.