Laserfiche WebLink
concentrated and skilled attention that the board does <br />not have the time or expertise to provide. The dual sys- <br />tem also provides a check and balance in the sense that <br />citizens can seek help from one office if they are dissat- <br />isfied with the other office’s response. This may moti- <br />vate each office to do an especially good job so that it <br />is not second guessed by the other. <br />•The auditor and board complement each other in some <br />respects: <br />—The board provides for direct citizen involvement <br />in police oversight, while the auditor represents <br />city government. According to Capt. George <br />Stoner, commander of the IA unit,“The dual sys- <br />tem makes sure that the department addresses all <br />segments of the city”—citizens and each branch of <br />local government. <br />— The board enables community representatives to <br />offer the lay perspective of the citizen regarding IA <br />investigations of alleged police misconduct, while <br />the auditor’s office makes it possible for a profes- <br />sional investigator to examine the department’s <br />investigations of alleged misconduct. <br />—The board provides a public forum in which citizens <br />can express general concerns about the department, <br />while the auditor can address dissatisfaction citizens <br />have about how IA handled specific complaints. <br />—When the auditor and board agree on a recom- <br />mended policy or procedure change, the recom- <br />mendation in effect has the backing of the city <br />manager, city council, and mayor. The auditor’s <br />and board’s agreement on a recommendation also <br />means that a professional investigator and lay <br />C ITIZEN R EVIEW OF P OLICE: APPROACHES AND I MPLEMENTATION <br />67 <br />SAN JOSE,CALIFORNIA’S,INDEPENDENT POLICE AUDITOR HAS SOME <br />SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES WITH TUCSON’S AUDITOR <br />Thirty-six percent of all complainants in San Jose file their cases with an independent police auditor rather than <br />with the police department. As in Tucson,Teresa Guerrero-Daley, the auditor, forwards the paperwork to the <br />police department’s internal affairs bureau, which conducts an investigation.The bureau then sends all its materials <br />on all cases—including those filed directly with the police department—to the auditor. Exchange of information is <br />simplified because the two agencies share a common computerized database. <br />Guerrero-Daley examines the case files for thoroughness and fairness, and she can request further investigation if <br />she is not satisfied with a finding. She monitors selected cases by sitting in on interviews or going to the scene of <br />the alleged incident. She becomes involved in all use-of-force cases. As can Liana Perez in Tucson, Guerrero-Daley <br />can require the IA investigators to ask questions she may have of complainants and officers during interviews. <br />Command staff, not IA staff, determine a disposition after the investigation. Complainants who disagree with the <br />finding or disposition may appeal to the auditor, who will review the case. If Guerrero-Daley disagrees with the <br />disposition, she sends a memo to the chief. On the few occasions each year when she and the chief disagree, they <br />meet together with the city manager (who appoints the chief) to reach a consensus. Guerrero-Daley can make <br />specific recommendations for training as well as for changes in policy and duty manuals.The chief has adopted 90 <br />percent of her recommendations. <br />With a staff of four professionals, the auditor’s office has a budget of $320,000. There is no citizen review board in <br />San Jose. Other cities with auditors—located primarily on the West Coast—include Seattle and Los Angeles. The <br />Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department in North Carolina, on its own initiative, hired a private accounting firm <br />to audit and recommend improvements to its complaints process.* <br />* See Walker, Sam,“New Directions in Citizen Oversight: The Auditor Approach to Handling Citizen Complaints,” in Problem-Oriented Policing: <br />Crime-Specific Problems, Critical Issues and Making POP Work, ed.Tara O’Connor Shelley and Anne C. Grant, Washington, D.C.: Police Executive <br />Research Forum, 1998: 161–178.