Laserfiche WebLink
As shown in exhibit 2–6, the ombudsman’s 1998–99 <br />budget was $540,744; 91 percent of the budget represent- <br />ed wages and benefits. With two investigators devoting <br />nearly full time to complaints against the police, and the <br />deputy devoting about one-quarter time to police cases, <br />the proportion of the budget devoted to complaints <br />against the police is about $174,000. <br />Distinctive features <br />Few jurisdictions in the country make use of an ombuds- <br />man to review police misconduct complaints. <br />• Because the ombudsman serves as a generalized com- <br />plaint handler for all government agencies, the city <br />cannot be criticized for singling out the police for <br />oversight. <br />• The ombudsman’s office provides citizens with an <br />alternative place to file complaints against the police <br />department. <br />• The ombudsman’s office helps IA to address com- <br />plainants’concerns by offering a satisfactory explanation <br />for an officer’s behavior that the complainant could not <br />or would not get from the subject officer or patrol desk. <br />• The office can subpoena department heads, including <br />the chief, as well as employees and all case files. It has <br />never used this power. <br />• The office can—and does—criticize officers by name <br />in the media for their behavior. This may serve to deter <br />some misconduct and anger officers. The public has <br />the opportunity to become aware of police misconduct <br />when the press prints the information. <br />• Politics could emasculate the office. Because the <br />mayor appoints the chief and the city council appoints <br />the ombudsman, conflict between the two could stymie <br />the office’s leverage if the mayor were to choose to <br />ignore the ombudsman whenever the ombudsman <br />wished to take serious exception to a chief’s findings. <br />For further information, contact: <br />Jessie Binian <br />Ombudsman <br />Office of the Ombudsman <br />City of Flint <br />Flint Municipal Center North Building <br />120 East Fifth Street, Second Floor <br />Flint, MI 48502 <br />810–766–7335 <br />The Minneapolis Civilian Police <br />Review Authority: An Oversight <br />System Investigates and Hears <br />Citizen Complaints <br />Background <br />The Minneapolis city council established the Civilian <br />Police Review Authority (CRA) by ordinance in 1990 <br />after African-American community leaders led protests <br />at city hall because officers had killed an elderly African- <br />American couple in a raid and had broken up an appar- <br />ently peaceful African-American college student party in <br />EXHIBIT 2–6. FLINT OMBUDSMAN’S OFFICE <br />1998–99 BUDGET <br />C HAPTER 2: CASE S TUDIES OF N INE O VERSIGHT P ROCEDURES <br />30 <br />Budget Item Funding Level <br />Wages and salaries $273,639 <br />Fringe benefits 220,123 <br />Supplies 5,784 <br />Newspapers, professional dues, and publications 240 <br />Professional services 20,000 <br />Micro software and leases 1,000 <br />Data processing services 3,358 <br />Professional services and commissions 3,400 <br />Communications 2,500 <br />Transportation 900 <br />Printing and publishing 1,500 <br />Insurance and bonds 100 <br />Repairs and maintenance 2,000 <br />Miscellaneous 200 <br />Education, training, and conferences 6,000 <br />Total $540,744