Laserfiche WebLink
The Flint City Charter states that “The Ombudsman may <br />investigate official acts of any agency which aggrieve any <br />person.” City departments are required to provide infor- <br />mation the ombudsman requests, and the office has the <br />power to subpoena witnesses (including police officers), <br />administer oaths, and take testimony. If elected officials <br />or appointees refuse to cooperate, the charter provides for <br />an obstruction hearing that could result in their forfeiting <br />their jobs. <br />The ombudsman establishes his or her own rules for <br />receiving and processing complaints, conducting investi- <br />gations and hearings, and reporting findings. In 1996, the <br />ombudsman’s office investigated 662 cases, 313 of which <br />(47 percent) involved complaints against police officers. <br />In 1995, 389 of 741 cases (52 percent) involved com- <br />plaints against the police. The office sustains 2 to 4 per- <br />cent of citizen complaints against the police annually. <br />The review process <br />Exhibit 2–5 shows the process the ombudsman’s office <br />uses to review complaints. <br />Intake <br />People learn about the ombudsman’s office from high- <br />profile cases covered by the media or by word of mouth <br />from coworkers. The police department’s IA unit does <br />not inform citizens about the ombudsman unless they <br />report they are unsatisfied with the department’s answers <br />to their questions. In addition, the ombudsman’s pre- <br />ferred response to complaints is to refer them to the <br />appropriate supervisor, accepting complaints primarily <br />when the citizen does not want to file with the police <br />department or is dissatisfied with the supervisor’s <br />response, or when the complaint appears to involve the <br />use of excessive force. Citizens who want to file com- <br />plaints with the ombudsman must agree to be inter- <br />viewed at the ombudsman’s office or at a location of <br />their choosing. The ombudsman assigns the citizens <br />to one of two investigators who specialize in police <br />complaints. <br />Informal resolutions <br />The assigned investigator may telephone the IA com- <br />mander to resolve the complaint informally, such as <br />clarifying a policy or procedure and then providing the <br />explanation to the complainant. The IA commander <br />may also choose to ask the shift commander of the sub- <br />ject officer to investigate the problem and then explain <br />the officer’s behavior to the complainant. About one- <br />quarter of complaints reported to the ombudsman are <br />settled by means of these informal approaches. <br />The ombudsman office investigator’s next option is medi- <br />ation. If both parties agree, the investigator arranges a <br />C ITIZEN R EVIEW OF P OLICE: APPROACHES AND I MPLEMENTATION <br />27 <br />EXHIBIT 2–5. FLINT OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S INVESTIGATION PROCESS <br />Citizen files <br />complaint with <br />ombudsman <br />Ombudsman’s <br />office investigates <br />Request for <br />information <br />sent to chief <br />Chief responds through: <br />l IA <br />l officer’s supervisor <br />l officer <br />Ombudsman <br />informs chief <br />of findings <br />Complaint is resolved <br />informally by: <br />l an explanation of police <br />procedures <br />l referral to officer’s <br />supervisor <br />l IA <br />l informal mediation