|
A DDRESSING C ORRECTIONAL O FFICER S TRESS
<br />165
<br />A
<br />added allegations 58, 113, 115
<br />Albuquerque 12, 88, 118, 128, 130, 138
<br />annual reports 103–104, 138
<br />appeals 24, 34, 39, 54, 65
<br />associations (see unions)
<br />audiences, for the publication 2–3
<br />auditors 6,41–46,62–65, 66–68, 104–105, 147–149
<br />B
<br />benefits (potential) of citizen oversight 6–12
<br />to communities 12
<br />to complainants 7–8
<br />to elected and appointed officials 10–12
<br />to subject officers and deputies 10, 115, 120
<br />to police and sheriff’s departments 8–10
<br />Berkeley 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 17, 20,21–26, 70–71, 80, 82,
<br />84, 84–85, 85, 87, 90, 94–96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 102, 103,
<br />105, 112, 116, 136
<br />board members 21–25, 46–51, 51–55, 65–68,84–88, 101,
<br />104–105, 112–114, 125
<br />Boise 6, 118
<br />budgets (see funding)
<br />C
<br />case studies (see also cases, vignettes of) 17–68
<br />cases, vignettes of 23, 24, 29, 35, 38, 78, 79
<br />Citizen Review of Police
<br />features 4–5, 18, 19
<br />organization of publication 2, 17
<br />purposes 3–4
<br />sources of information used in preparation of
<br />report 4–5
<br />terminology used in report 5, 143–144
<br />commissioners (see board members)
<br />community policing 9–10
<br />complainants—eligibility 98–99
<br />consumer satisfaction surveys 125–127
<br />costs (see funding)
<br />crowd control 71, 82
<br />conflicts 107–121
<br />among local government officials 104–105
<br />between oversight and police and sheriff’s
<br />departments 3–4, 101, 105,109–117
<br />between oversight and activists 3–4, 109
<br />D
<br />delays in case processing 98,101–102, 113–114
<br />directors 90
<br />discipline of officers 13, 24, 28, 34, 48, 54, 55, 59, 60, 64,
<br />80,111,143
<br />E
<br />early warning systems 35, 60,80–82
<br />effectiveness of citizen oversight (see also evaluation)
<br />12–16, 123
<br />evaluation 127–128, 130
<br />F
<br />federations (see unions)
<br />filing locations 96–97
<br />Flint 10,26–30, 71, 100, 104, 111, 124, 134
<br />funding
<br />average cost per complaint 131–132, 136
<br />budgets 18, 25, 30, 36, 40, 45, 50, 54–55, 60–61, 65,
<br />128–129,131–135
<br />determining funding needs 84–85, 134, 136,
<br />163–164
<br />Citizen review programs are listed by jurisdiction, not by official title (e.g.,“Rochester,” not “Civilian Review Board.”
<br />Index
<br />Citizen review programs are listed by jurisdiction, not by official title (e.g.,“Rochester,” not “Civilian Review Board.”)
|