My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Document of Interest Provided By Councilmember Hamann on Civilian Review Boards
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Community Police Review Board (CPRB)
>
Document of Interest Provided By Councilmember Hamann on Civilian Review Boards
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2020 10:09:33 AM
Creation date
6/23/2020 10:08:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C HAPTER 7: MONITORING, EVALUATION, AND F UNDING <br />130 <br />THE ALBUQUERQUE CITY COUNCIL COMMISSIONED A <br />THOROUGH EVALUATION <br />Troubled by fatal shootings by Albuquerque police officers (31 in 10 years), extremely high annual payments for <br />tort claims involving police officers (up to $2.5 million per year), and other concerns, the Albuquerque City <br />Council in 1996 hired Eileen Luna and Samuel Walker, two well-known experts in citizen review of police, to <br />evaluate the city’s oversight mechanisms. Luna and Walker’s 159-page report concluded:“The existing mechanisms <br />for oversight ...are not functioning effectively” (emphasis in original).1 <br />The researchers used five sources of data: <br />1.A survey administered in person to more than 357 rank-and-file officers (44 percent of the total sworn <br />officer force) consisting of 70 close-ended and several open-ended questions. <br />2.Personal interviews with: <br />• Community members, including leaders and members of human rights, civil rights, and neighborhood <br />organizations; attorneys in private and public practice; and spokespersons for ethnic communities. <br />• Police officers, including the chief, command officers, union officers, and the staff psychologist. <br />• Public officials, including the mayor, city council members, and advisory board members. <br />3.A review of official documents, ranging from advisory board minutes to internal affairs quarterly reports. <br />4.An audit of the internal affairs unit’s general patterns and practices, including: <br />• Complaint files for 1994–96. <br />• A consumer satisfaction survey administrated to everyone who had filed a complaint during the previous <br />3 years. <br />5.A national survey of citizen oversight mechanisms. <br />The report concluded with 10 recommendations for improving the oversight process in Albuquerque, including <br />advocating that oversight procedure administrators exercise fully the authority they already had and that the <br />mayor and city council take a more active role in overseeing the police department. <br />In October 1998, the city council enacted the Police Oversight Ordinance to restructure the city’s oversight sys- <br />tem along the lines of the report’s recommendations. According to coauthor Samuel Walker,“The City Council is <br />to be commended.They paid an outsider to come in and then acted on those [recommended] changes.Very often <br />these reports just sit on a shelf.”2 The council provided for an 18-month evaluation of the new oversight system. <br />1. Luna, Eileen, and Samuel Walker,A Report on the Oversight Mechanisms of the Albuquerque Police Department,prepared for the <br />Albuquerque City Council, 1997. <br />2.Law Enforcement News,“Who’s Watching the Watchers?” 29 (499) (November 15, 1998).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.