My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Document of Interest Provided By Councilmember Hamann on Civilian Review Boards
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Community Police Review Board (CPRB)
>
Document of Interest Provided By Councilmember Hamann on Civilian Review Boards
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2020 10:09:33 AM
Creation date
6/23/2020 10:08:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chapter 4: Staffing <br />Citizen oversight procedures may require three principal <br />types of staff: <br />• Volunteer board members. <br />• Professional investigators. <br />• An executive director. <br />1 <br />Talented and fair staff in all of these categories are essen- <br />tial for citizen oversight to achieve its potential benefits. <br />Incompetent staff will not be able to perform their respon- <br />sibilities, while biased staff will create conflict that can <br />grind the process to a halt. Staff must also be flexible. <br />Fred Lau, the San Francisco police chief, said: <br />The OCC [Office of Citizen Complaints] execu- <br />tive director is extremely critical to the relation- <br />ship to the police department. If I didn’t have a <br />good working relationship with Mary Dunlap, it <br />would be horrible. She is willing not to be rigid, <br />sit down with department subject matter experts, <br />and talk. She is tough and tenacious, but we have <br />never come to an impasse—we’ve never had to go <br />to the [police] commission for a tiebreaker. <br />C ITIZEN R EVIEW OF P OLICE: APPROACHES AND I MPLEMENTATION <br />83 <br />KEY POINTS <br />• Citizen oversight bodies most commonly need three types of staff: volunteer board members, professional <br />investigators, and an executive director. <br />• Talented and fair staff are essential for any oversight procedure to be effective. <br />• Because they may have no formal credentials, selecting board members is especially tricky. <br />— Before recruiting board members, jurisdictions should establish the specific responsibilities they expect the <br />board to assume.Then jurisdictions need to decide how large their board will be, members’ terms of office, <br />and their honoraria, if any. <br />— A common selection criterion is to include diversity. Permitting current or former police officers or sheriff’s <br />deputies to serve is controversial. <br />— The process of selecting board members can involve public hearings, private interviews, and word of mouth. <br />— Training for board members can include lectures, materials review (e.g., department policies and proce- <br />dures), attending a citizens’ academy, ride-alongs, and training as mediators. <br />• Some oversight systems involve the use of paid investigators. <br />— Investigators need to be able to handle the potential stress of interviewing sometimes angry complainants <br />and hostile officers. <br />— Many jurisdictions try to hire investigators with a law enforcement background. <br />— Senior staff train new investigators. Novices also learn on the job. <br />• Along with the police chief or sheriff, the executive director or auditor will have the greatest influence on <br />whether the oversight system achieves its objectives. Most jurisdictions make considerable use of word of <br />mouth to find the most qualified individual.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.