My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 12-19-97
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
RM 12-19-97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 3:18:26 PM
Creation date
10/9/2012 8:43:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting - December 19, 1997 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />r. continued.... <br />South Bend Central Development Area <br />Plan. Just for the record, why don't we <br />refer to that now as Exhibit B. <br />JON HUNT: What we propose now is <br />what we would see as a development <br />concept for that quarter block and this <br />broad brush- stroke concept would be <br />translated into both bid documents and <br />development standards for that site, if you <br />acquire that property and put it up for <br />public bid. We believe that the acquisition <br />and the assemblage does in fact support <br />what our long -term plans are and what the <br />community's long -term plans are for the <br />core area. First of all, the development <br />concept that we would call for, would call <br />for a 50,000 to 75,000 sf Class A office <br />building, either multi -tenant or corporate <br />headquarters. We would also suggest that <br />the development concept be translated into <br />a three to four -story building, urban style, <br />masonry facade. We suggest very strongly <br />in the bid documents that the requirement <br />be put forward to anchor the Southwest <br />corner, which is in a high visibility <br />corridor of downtown and anchor it by not <br />creating and pushing the building back off <br />of the lot lines but by bringing the building <br />up to the front. If in doing that, if there <br />were interests in the development of a <br />plaza of some sort, we would suggest that <br />it be limited in size and be very, very <br />pedestrian friendly on this heavy <br />pedestrian corridor. We also would stress <br />that any building or development that <br />F:\ HOME\ CPHIPPS \WPDATA \COMMSN\121997.MIN -32- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.