My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
September 2018
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes and Recordings
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2018
>
September 2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 6:52:32 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:19:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001404
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of <br />• the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. <br />F. Signs <br />No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and supergraphics will also <br />be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. <br />G. Building Site and Landscaping <br />(These standards apply to both A and B) <br />1. Required <br />Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the <br />property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, <br />patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, <br />trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and <br />inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. <br />2. Recommended <br />New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, <br />and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings <br />historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by <br />suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing <br />appropriate. <br />Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. <br />3. Prohibited <br />No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, <br />outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas <br />shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor <br />blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in <br />areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. <br />• STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is cognizant of recent precedent regarding the proposed <br />installation of multiple signs on other downtown commercial buildings (see the J.M.S. Building). Bearing <br />that in mind, staff approves the format and appearance of the proposed signs — as they are historic and <br />complimentary to the building's character — but would encourage debate regarding the number to be <br />installed. It is also worth noting, however, that only the "The LaSalle" blade sign above the east entrance <br />was approved by the Commission. All other window signs appear to have been installed un -reviewed. <br />They are not, however, part of this application and need not be scrutinized as a part of it. <br />As to specific recommendations per the number of installations, Historic Preservation Administrator <br />Feasel advocates for the installation of half the number of window signs (one each on the North and East <br />faces). Historic Preservation Specialist Toering believes the wording of the Standards and Guidelines to <br />be unintentionally ambiguous, and that further revision of those standards may be in order to better <br />accommodate the various kinds of signage that can be found on historic commercial buildings. With <br />regards to this particular application, Specialist Toering would advocate for the allowance of all four of <br />the requested window signs. <br />Written by <br />Adam Toering <br />Historic Preservation Specialist <br />Approved by <br />Elicia Feasel <br />Historic Preservation Administrator <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.