My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
September 2018
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes and Recordings
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2018
>
September 2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 6:52:32 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:19:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001404
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• signs should be viewed as part of an overall graphics system for the building. They do not have to do <br />all the "work" by themselves. The building's form, name and outstanding features, both decorative and • <br />functional, also support the advertising function of a sign. Signs should work with the building, rather <br />than against it. <br />• new signs should respect the size, scale and design of the historic building. Often features or details of <br />the building will suggest a motif for new signs. <br />• sign placement is important: new signs should not obscure significant features of the historic building. <br />(Signs above a storefront should fit within the historic signboard, for example) <br />• new signs should also respect neighboring buildings. They should not shadow or overpower adjacent <br />structures. <br />• sign materials should be compatible with those of the historic building. Materials characteristic of the <br />building's period and style, used in contemporary designs, can form effective new signs. <br />• new signs should be attached to the building carefully, both to prevent damage to historic fabric, and <br />to ensure the safety of pedestrians. Fittings should penetrate mortar joints rather than brick, for <br />example, and signloads should be properly calculated and distributed. <br />The proposed design compliments the architectural elements of the building (mimicking the curvature of the <br />windows), is a facsimile of the gold -leaf signage that was so prevalent in the late 19t' and early 201 century, and is <br />respectful to the size and scale of the windows themselves. <br />Other communities with large concentrations of historic commercial buildings have exemptions for the number of <br />allowable windows with signs within their Standards and Guidelines. <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: <br />GROUP B STANDARDS <br />The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, <br />or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where • <br />appropriate. <br />A. Maintenance <br />The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general <br />cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. <br />B. Treatment <br />Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements <br />include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the <br />character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a <br />Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may <br />not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed <br />treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. <br />C. Renovation and Additions <br />Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. <br />A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). <br />Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular <br />examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of <br />overall <br />appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the <br />additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: <br />1. Structure–Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to <br />cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. <br />2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material <br />as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. <br />a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. <br />b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional <br />siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned <br />to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. <br />D. Demolition <br />Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only • <br />alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both <br />the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible <br />for this documentation. <br />E. Moving <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.