Laserfiche WebLink
brick, limestone, flagstone, sandstone and stucco shall be cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains, <br />and shall be done with a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low pressure water and soft natural bristle <br />bushes. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture compatible in composition, color and texture shall be used. <br />Recommended <br />Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the <br />only alternative to maintaining or replacing the original surface material. When used over wood surfaces, this siding <br />should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around <br />windows, doors, cornicles, gables, eaves and other architectural features. Ample ventilation must be afforded the <br />structure when metal or vinyl siding has been installed in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from <br />moisture and/or insects. Mortal joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems or when sufficient <br />mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, <br />joint size, method of application and joint profile. It is emphasized that, prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort, <br />the property owner should contact the Historical Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County which is located <br />in the County/City Building of South Bend. The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of <br />rehabilitation and restoration. <br />Prohibited <br />Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material which is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was <br />constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall <br />not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface <br />material and accelerates deterioration. Brick surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Repointing <br />shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building <br />material. This can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and the differing porosity of the <br />material and the mortar, which can result in serious damage to adjacent brick. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces <br />indiscriminately. <br />Not Recommended <br />Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless <br />required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and <br />can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints which do not need repointed should not be repointed. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The applicant is prepared to replace the existing cedar trim as allowed for with RME #2018- <br />0809 but has voiced concern that replacing the Cedar shingles is considered cost prohibitive by the homeowner. Because of the <br />location of these Cedar shingle portions of the house, the degradation of the material has been accelerated leading to regular and <br />continued maintenance by the contractor. <br />As an alternative, Staff was willing to consider the replacement of the shingles with LP Smartside. Staff is of the understanding <br />that this material — when cut to fit the roofline of the structure — will have a higher probability of being compromised by the <br />elements (specifically water at the seams) as well as the temperature extremes of Indiana seasons (with expansion and <br />contraction). <br />The final option presented with this application is preferred by the contractor/applicant: replacing the cedar shingles with a <br />polypropylene siding replicating the style of cedar siding. The majority of this siding is at the rear of the structure and has <br />limited visibility from the street. The Standards and Guidelines for the district do allow for the installation of metal or vinyl <br />siding in the event that it is the "only alternative to maintaining or replacing the original material." However, Staff believes that <br />replacement Cedar shake shingles are readily available. <br />In a best case scenario, Staff recommends replacing the shingles with new Cedar Siding. In lieu of that option, staff is conflicted <br />and offers no recommendation. <br />Written by <br />Adam Toering <br />Historic Preservation Specialist <br />Approved by <br />Elicia Feasel <br />Historic Preservation Administrator <br />Commissioner Gordon made a motion to approve COA #2018-0809A with the replacement <br />• double -seven perfection shingle. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. <br />15 <br />