Laserfiche WebLink
work of removing the plaster. Owner proposes 21 new Anderson 200 vinyl clad windows in the same pattern as existing windows, mostly 1/1 <br />double hung but with four 3/1 double hung in the 1" storey dining room windows. <br />PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: <br />Today I met the owner of 539 Riverside Dr at the property at 12:30pm. Earlier this morning at 8:30am Troy entered the HPC Office <br />to complete the application he had started the evening before. He had expressed a desire to replace the windows at the property with Anderson <br />Series 200. He had expressed his concerns about being able to repair the existing windows after further investigation by way of removing some of <br />the plaster and trim work. He suggests that the trimwork/tracks from the existing exterior storms had created a channel for water to collect and <br />enter the house. <br />I entered the ground floor of the property where all of the interior trim and several of the plaster walls had been removed. I noticed <br />right away the rough in framework of the lower level had significant deterioration. I also noticed and photographed the buckling and blistering of <br />the plaster underneath the windows as well as the drip trails (water marks) that were still visible where the floor trim had been removed. <br />I photographed each window paying particular attention to the framework and below. It is obvious to me that water has been entering <br />and running down the interior through the plaster lath. Upon further inspection I noticed that in fact the exterior trim was missing as the owner <br />had indicated in his application. This is part of the way in which elements are entering the structure. The windows on the main floor are framed <br />into the brick and they appear to be the worse off. In several locations, the framework is rotted away. The upstairs windows have some of the <br />same water marks and blistering in the plaster. Only one area was down to stud and the wood was wet to the touch on the inside. Although six of <br />the window sashes upstairs are structural sound, they are painted shut and I was unable to see the sills and rails. The plaster is still intact on those <br />and the rough in frame work is unable to be inspected. It is noteworthy that 4 panes of glass have been replaced with plexi -glass. This includes <br />the large sashes on the main floor. <br />The windows on the first floor will have to be removed and the rough in framework replaced where necessary as well as the jambs and <br />sills replaced as well. Currently they are too wet to determine their structural integrity. There are 11 windows on the ground level. There are four <br />(4) double hung 3 over I grill pattern, six (6) 1 over 1, and one picture window without grills. The second floor has ten (10) double -hung 1 over <br />1. <br />Steve Szaday <br />Preservation Specialist <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: <br />II. EXISTING STRUCTURES <br />C. WINDOWS AND DOORS <br />Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where synthetic siding has <br />been applied, window trim has been covered. Many structures in the district have aluminum storm windows. Some houses retain wood framed <br />storm windows. <br />Required <br />Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware shall be retained or when <br />deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with units and trim resembling the original. <br />Recommended <br />Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match the original, should be used but should not <br />damage existing frames. If new sash and doors are used, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal <br />storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. <br />Prohibited <br />Original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings <br />which would alter the scale and proportion of the building should not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as <br />aluminum and insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. <br />Not Recommended <br />Awnings, hoods or fake shutters made of metal, vinyl or fiber glass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or <br />appearance of the building. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed project. <br />Elicia Feasel <br />Executive Director <br />On a motion by Tom Gordon with a second by Michele Gelfman to approve application as <br />submitted with a recommendation for an allowance to remove the rear staircase to the upper deck <br />without another COA being necessary. <br />Vote: 6 — 0 Unanimous. <br />COA#2016-0111A Approved with an allowance. <br />III. HEARING OF VISITORS — <br />A. Todd Zeiger, Director of Northern Regional Office for Indiana Landmarks, office 402 West <br />Washington Street, following up on a letter sent to HPC seeking to start the process for Local <br />Landmark designation for a property owned by Indiana Landmarks, the Kizer House at 803 <br />West Washington with intention to provide comprehensive coverage of the entire site where <br />former easement excluded the carriage house. <br />IV. REGULAR BUSINESS <br />A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — <br />1. December 21, 2015 — Approved by general consent. <br />