My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
April 2016
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes and Recordings
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2016
>
April 2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:20 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:17:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001364
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 2 <br />Elicia Feasel - Preservation support for 614 Sherman Ave <br />From: clinton gilkie <gilkieI l l @gmail.com> <br />To: <EFeasel @co.st joseph.in.us >, <dcipmeyer @southbendin.gov> <br />Date: 4/3/2016 11:00 AM <br />Subject: Preservation support for 614 Sherman Ave <br />Myself ( Shundra Gilkie) and my husband Clinton Gilkie III are asking for your support <br />in preserving the character of our home and nearby lots. As of 2013, all of the vacant <br />homes have been demolished on our block including a commercial building that <br />faced LWW. Since then we found out that the city owns the 2 lots next to us 616/618 <br />Sherman and we have been denied the opportunity of ownership. <br />It seems that the city has several other properties that are sporadic on this block. The <br />cities reasoning for denying us ownership is because they are "holding it for future <br />development." <br />I want our voice to be heard to avoid the city placing government housing on this <br />block (if that's the future plan). I would hope that the city would like to preserve or <br />improve the neighborhood and public housing would do just the opposite. With <br />government housing, you impose the risk of multiple tenants, weak or no source of <br />income, and no vested interest from the renters. With that being said, this would be a <br />haven again for prostitution, drugs, violence and an un -kept overall appearance of <br />the neighborhood just to name a few negatives. These are the things we are fighting <br />so hard to remove. Wouldn't it be better to maintain this 600 block of Sherman along <br />with all of the positive efforts towards the rehabilitation to preserve historical homes? <br />Also, being a landmark home built in 1915, 1 feel that anything built should have the <br />same integrity if not greater than our home on this entire block. By at least owning <br />616/618 my husband and I dictate what can go there with the help of the Historic <br />Preservation Commission. I'm uncertain why the city has such interest because it is <br />neglected on a regular basis. Since 2011, my husband regularly mows the lot <br />because it makes our yard look bad. The city on averaged come and mows every 5 -6 <br />weeks. Starting usually late in the spring and stopping early in the fall. There are <br />large amounts of trash being dumped in the wooded ,lot near the alley. An old <br />mattress sat there for while and now is in our back yard. Now it's our responsibility to <br />remove it and the lot isn't even ours. <br />Please assist us with the ability to preserve the character of our neighborhood. <br />Thank You, <br />Clinton and Shundra Gilkie <br />file: / / /C:/ Users / EFeasel/ AppData/ LocallTemp/ XPgrpwise /5700F7CAInternalPLEXISPO 10... 4/4/2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.