May 2015 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed projects. C.D. Hostetler, Director On a motion by Brandon Anderson with a second by Elizabeth Hertel to approve application as presented with the condition that there will be Staff approval for the final window design for the three front attic window. Vote: 6 — 0 unanimous. COA#2015-0504D Approved with Conditions. 1. 917 Leland COA42015-0428 Chapin Park No representation STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 6 May 2015 Application Number: 2015-0428 Property Location: 917 Leland Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 1900/Free Classic Property Owner: Nicole and Alex Scheidler Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a two storey plus attic Free Classic has an irregular plan and is situated on a brick foundation. The exterior walls are clapboard siding with Corner boards. The steep hipped roof is covered with asphalt shingles.. There is a full width porch across front with wood flooring and balustrade and spindle newal posts, doric wood columns, concrete steps and lattice work at base. The windows are wood 1/1 double hung though out; oval hall window on south, arched window in porch; fanlight in gable; glazed wood panel door. ALTERATIONS: No alterations to the exterior of the house other than the fire. APPLICATION ITEMS: Demolish the house. Several contactors have told us we do not have sufficient funds to replace in- kind. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The home has been severely damaged by a fire that was so intense that it melted the appliances in the kitchen. The entire structural integrity of this house has been severely compromised. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: V GENERAL: A. Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where a building poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative. Documentation of interior and exterior features of the original buildings, especially homes rated as historically significant, is encouraged. Measured drawings and photographs may be submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Catherine D. Hostetler, Director On a motion by Elizabeth Hertel with a second by Brandon Anderson to deny application as presented. Vote: 6 — 0 unanimous. Elizabeth Hertel: This is an open fire investigation and no cause and origin have been determined. Brandon Anderson: Lack of sufficient documentation for taking the building down due its structural integrity and continuing to be an open investigation. Mike Voll: Not quite enough information on its overall damage and rebuild ability to make a decision to take it down, whereas if some of the rear end has to be done, the street looks pretty good. . E