January 2015 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of ht landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has been working with Granger Paths and Mr. and Mrs. Snyder since 2005 concerning the mixed use trail system and with the Troyer Group for the past two years concerning the location of the trail and its impact on this landmarked home. Staff has met onsite most recently with the Snyders and the Troyer Group in the Summer of 2014. Staff also participated in a December Conference call with the Troyer Group, Mary Kennedy, INDOT Cultural Resources Office, Ashley Thomas, IDNR DHPA, concerning the impact of the tree removals on the landmark and the placement of the Bowhall Maples, during which it was determined that the project and replanting would not adversely impact the landmark. Staff recommends approval of this project as presented. On a motion by Kevin Buccellato with a second by Tom Gordon to approve as submitted. Vote: 5 — 0 unanimous. COA#2015-0112 Approved. B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION — None. III. HEARING OF VISITORS — None. IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — December 15, 2014 draft #3 approved by general consent. B. TREASURER'S REPORT 1. Location Report — Distributed. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence —Circulated. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals —Circulated. 3. Director's Report —Distributed. 4. Assistant Director Report —Distributed. 5. Preservation Specialist Report —Distributed. 6. Legal Counsel None. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Presidents Report — 2015 Standing Committees distributed. V. OLD BUSINESS A. ELECTION OF OFFICERS — none. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Kizer House Easement — 2