My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
December 2015
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2015
>
December 2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:20 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:16:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001364
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
When the mastic siding was removed from this house in 2013, the contractor failed to do the necessary <br />repairs to the clap -board as well as the transitional flashing and trim work. They merely painted the poor <br />areas to match including the flashing and failed trim work. As a result, almost all four corners have <br />sustained damage and rot where the mitered boards meet. There are also areas where flashing ran <br />underneath the old mastic siding now remains and actually collects water and allows it to run under the <br />clap -board or even roofing material instead. I entered the third floor attic and noticed daylight through <br />many of the loose and damaged cedar shake. Although the shake itself was in a repairable condition, the <br />transitions are loose, rotted, and would need to be replaced. The owner expressed a desire to replace both <br />levels as the new siding would be able to transition in a way that the elements would flow more fluidly <br />over it. The shakes would have to be removed and reinstalled with new wood transitional trim work that <br />would consist of several "stepping" levels of trim. The rear of the house has a cement steps/landing from <br />a since removed lean-to storage area and a set of cement steps at rear door. The owner proposes to butt up <br />to the existing steps/landing and continue with a wood deck that will sit flush in height and sit in between <br />the support posts of the second level deck and the house. He also suggests matching the upper deck by <br />using the same lumber and railings on the lower deck. The current stairs/landings lack handrails and <br />railings which the owner plans to rectify as part of the new deck. <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: <br />II. EXISTING STRUCTURES <br />A. BUILDING MATERIALS <br />Original exterior wall materials in the District include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles and masonry block. In <br />some instances, vinyl or aluminum siding has been applied over the original material. <br />Required <br />Original exterior building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through <br />repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves should be <br />retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry <br />including brick and stucco shall be cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains, and shall <br />be done with a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low pressure water and soft natural bristle <br />brushes. When repairing stucco, only appropriate stucco mixture shall be used. <br />Recommended <br />Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. Metal or vinyl may be used as an alternative <br />to maintaining or replacing the original surface material when it resembles the original surface material. When used <br />over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made <br />to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves and other architectural features. Ample <br />ventilation must be afforded the structure when aluminum or vinyl is to be installed in order to prevent increased <br />deterioration of the structure from moisture and/or insects. Mortar joints should be repointed only when there is <br />evidence of moisture problems or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. <br />Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. <br />Prohibited <br />Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with material such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles, <br />which is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed. Sandblasting or the use of harsh <br />detergents shall not be used on masonry or stucco. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and <br />accelerates deterioration. <br />Not Recommended <br />Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces <br />unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary <br />and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints which do not need repointing should <br />not be. Repointing should not be done with mortar of high Portland cement content, which can often create a bond <br />that is stronger than the building materials. This can cause deterioration as a result of the differing porosity of the <br />material and the mortar— the end result being serious damage to adjacent brick. Paint should not be removed from <br />masonry surfaces indiscriminately. <br />C. WINDOWS AND DOORS <br />Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases <br />where synthetic siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Many structures in the district have <br />aluminum storm windows. Some houses retain wood framed storm windows. <br />Required <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.