Laserfiche WebLink
)V <br />distinguishable entity whose components lack individual <br />distinction; or <br />Criteria D has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in <br />prehistory or history. <br />Ordinarily, cemeteries, birthplaces, graves of historical figures, properties <br />owned by religious institutions or used for religious purposes, structures <br />which have been moved from their original locations, reconstructed historic <br />buildings, properties commemorative in nature, and properties which have <br />received significance within the last 50 years, shall not be considered eliaible <br />for the National Register. However, such properties will pualifv if they are <br />integral parts of historic districts which meet the criteria or if they fall within <br />the categories established by the National Park Service as Criteria <br />Consideration/Exemptions. <br />Evaluation of the Nomination <br />The Sons of Israel Synagogue meets two of the four possible criteria. As cited <br />in the nomination the property meets Criterion A due to the building's use as <br />an early house of worship for an orthodox congregation composed of a number <br />of Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe and Russia to the area. It also <br />meets Criterion C due to the building's unique Romanesque Revival <br />architecture with its congregants' ethnic roots reflected in its details and <br />styling. It was designed by local South Bend architects Freyermuth and <br />Maurer and constructed by the Indiana Lumber and Manufacturing Builders <br />of South Bend. <br />Staff Comments <br />Staff has evaluated the submitted nomination according to procedures, <br />policies, standards, and criteria established by the National Park Service and <br />the Division of Historic Preservation & Archaeology pursuant to Certified <br />Local Government and applicable federal regulations. Staff visited the site <br />and toured the interior and exterior of Sons of Israel Synagogue at various <br />times between 2005 and 2011. The contextual development, format, <br />supplementary documentation and information presented are considered <br />