October 2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

additional springs could be surfacing along Riverside Drive. Mr. Littrell concluded that the water problems at 503 Riverside could be explained by the past uses of site and/or due to the eternal springs in the area. In addition, the City would like to get the cistern disconnected from the City sewers and channeled into a location that would be more efficient for carrying water away from the property. Staff asked Mr. Littrell his opinion as to if the proposed vacant site would be buildable, in which he concluded that it would more than likely be buildable but that a geotechnical engineer should be consulted and knowledge about the site should be disclosed to prospective buyers. This property begins the district on the South side of Riverside Drive; although it is considered a contributing property to the district, the integrity has been altered by the addition of numerous replacement features. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: V. GENERAL A. Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where a building poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative. Documentation of interior and exterior features of the original buildings, especially homes rated as historically significant, is encouraged. Measured drawings and photographs may be submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Even though this building does not appear to pose a threat to public safety as the standards and guidelines state for demolition, it is evident that the property the house is situated on has been compromised by water issues since the 1830s. There is currently evidence of mold but no testing has been done. Staff recommends that the owner be in contact with City Engineer, Carl Littrell regarding a disconnect from City sewers and possibly removing water more efficiently from the property. Based on owners discussion with Carl, if this cannot be done, with the ongoing water issues that may not be able to be resolved, staff would be inclined to recommend approval of the proposed project because the structure has been so compromised and its integrity will continue to deteriorate. After a lengthy discussion between the homeowner and the Commissioners the Homeowner signed a Waiver of Statutory Limit and on a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Sandy Rossow COA#2010.0907A was Continued with a unanimous vote 7.0. The Commissioners were then encouraged to meet with the property owner and tour the site. Hearing of Visitors: There were no visitors at this time. 11