My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
June 2008
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2008
>
June 2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:18 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:13:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001361
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
May 14, 2008 <br />The National Historical Society <br />South Bend, Indiana 46601 <br />Dear Friends at the Historical Society, <br />Recently, I applied for a city grant to put siding on my house at 713 W. LaSalle Ave, with <br />the help of my property management company's representative, Sharon Czarnecki. I <br />have just learned that this request was turned down because of the concerns of the <br />Historical Society that my house is an historical landmark. <br />I understand and agree with the mission of the historical society to preserve the history <br />and character of our South Bend downtown. However, as a homeowner, I find myself <br />in a difficult position in trying to keep up financially with the needs and costs of <br />preservation for the home and the area. I bought the home because I love both the <br />historical craftsmanship and beauty of the home and because I am committed to the <br />neighborhood and area. But I have had to move from South Bend for employment <br />reasons. I have tried to sell the home to someone else who would appreciate its value. <br />After two years on the market, I had no takers, only one bid that came in at 20 per cent <br />below the market appraisal value. I have been subjected to a very high tax rate as a <br />nonresident of the house, increasing the costs for me of owning the home. As a <br />landlord, I try to keep the home in good condition for the tenants, as my property <br />management company can confirm. I have made necessary repairs, upgraded the <br />heating system and added air conditioning, replaced appliances, and generally tried <br />to keep the house in good shape. All this comes at considerable costs, which is not fully <br />covered by the revenues from rental income. It has not always been easy to attract <br />tenants because of perceptions about the safety and quality of life in the <br />neighborhood, and the house has at times sat vacant. <br />Given these challenges, partly due to a skewed property tax system, partly due to <br />larger challenges of urban regeneration and historical preservation in a town with <br />extensive suburban housing construction, partly due to a nationwide market slump in <br />housing, it is very difficult in South Bend as a property owner of an historical landmark to <br />maintain the house in the conditions that either I, the city, or the Historical Society would <br />aspire to. Every year, I lose money on this house. I have sought quotes for painting the <br />house with the assistance of the property management company. It is very expensive; <br />it costs more than 10 percent of the house's value to paint it, a sum that is high in <br />absolute terms as well as relative terms. As the sole breadwinner for my family, covering <br />my own family's living expenses as well as trying to keep the house in South Bend in <br />good condition while trying to sell it, I have been unable to afford the cost of repainting <br />the house. It was for this reason, as well as the problem of the age of the house and its <br />corresponding risks of lead paint that we were interested in the grant program to assist <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.