Laserfiche WebLink
Chase: Well these were stated as some hardships and I don't think that they would be a <br />hardship. But, if you decide to put on a roof and you want to do it in a blazing snowstorm <br />that is not good thinking. If you do what needs to be done at the time of the year that it is <br />feasible, it could be done very easily. <br />Rodes: What I am thinking of are the storm windows, the kind you hang in the fall and <br />you take down in the spring. <br />Hostetler: But, these are the ones we recommended for him. A photograph was <br />presented to Professor Rodes of the interior storm window approved by the Department <br />of the Interior for historic renovation projects from Allied Window, Inc of Cincinnati, <br />Ohio.) Can you see them? <br />Rodes: No. <br />Hostetler: They are the interior ones. <br />Klusczinski: Which are typical of the ones that we would recommend for structures like <br />that would have any difficulty in applying exterior storms. <br />Chase: So I was just answering questions that were in your correspondence. <br />Rodes: As I say, I will leave the technicalities for my client who is here, now and <br />available for questions. I confine myself to the legal arguments. <br />Klusczinski: And I think that is what we are confined to here tonight are the legal <br />arguments. <br />Rodes: That is as far as my expertise goes. I have decided not to get into the <br />technicalities. <br />Klusczinski: In light of what you wrote and what we received and what we reviewed, I <br />think we wanted to establish that there was a great deal of support from this Commission <br />to try to find compromises and alternative solutions; making several visits; doing <br />investigations and finding something that we could achieve energy efficiency with and <br />also preserve the historical integrity of a building that is very important. <br />Rodes: That, there were long discussions which my client was not satisfied. He asked <br />me to raise the legal point and I have done so. My client is here if you wish to.... <br />Enderle: I wish to say a few words. My name is Georges Enderle 710 Park Avenue, the <br />owner of the house. As you know it has been a long process; I started a search with the <br />Commission not in the fall but in July, 2006; and had first meetings with the Commission <br />and was hoping that within three months it would be possible. I could not do it before <br />because I was many months in China. Second: About what Mr. Zeiger said about the big <br />change of the width and the height of the windows, that is not exact, because the <br />difference is not even half an inch in width and in the determined height is one inch <br />higher. <br />Zeiger: What it the precedent, I'm sorry, what is the procedure here for this discussion... <br />Klusczinski: Point of order? <br />DeRose: There's no motion on the table ... so you can... <br />Zeiger: Then I have a question for the owner if I might, Mr. Chairman. Sir, I am reading <br />from your COA which you submitted. <br />Enderle: Yes, exactly, I am reading this, also, the same text. The openings of the <br />window sashes are 30 5/8 and the existing window is 31 1/4, so this is not even a half an <br />inch... <br />Zeiger: But it is a diminishment of size. My question was is this smaller than the <br />existing windows? <br />10 <br />