My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
January 2007
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2007
>
January 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:17 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:13:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001361
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
difference in the way that the property would look once that is done. Just make sure that it is in <br />the right era and so I deny for that reason. <br />Ujdak: My vote would be to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness, I think that we've just <br />gone a little bit too far with this. This is much ado about nothing. Almost anything will help the <br />appearance of this house, if you've been out there and looked at it. <br />Patrick: I have. I look at that house almost every day. <br />Ujdak: Almost anything would help. <br />Sporleder: I vote to approve partially because its easier to vote that way. <br />Patrick: I'm sorry? <br />Sporleder: I vote to approve, period. <br />Patrick: Did you vote Catherine? <br />Hostetler: No, I did not. I wrote the staff report, so obviously I vote to approve but I do express <br />concern because the application specified that they were going to just side the house and paint <br />the trim and the facia and the soffits. It didn't look like the walls were going to be done, but the <br />architectural features were still going to be able to be seen, and that doesn't seem to be the case <br />now. <br />Patrick: Ok It's been denied. <br />Motion: Zeiger Second: Klusczinski In favor:, Zeiger, Chase, Klusczinski <br />(to deny) Choitz, Riley, Patrick <br />Opposed: Hostetler, Ujdak, Sporleder <br />Sporleder: Are we going to give them any suggestions of what they can do next? <br />Patrick: We'll ask staff to communicate with us as you expose what's under the asphalt. You can <br />call the office and they can call us and let us know. <br />Culp: How fast of a turn around can this be because we're going into winter right now, I've got <br />about another week that Bill's crews can be outside. <br />Patrick: We all live locally, so as soon as you call and say that you've got something to show. <br />Culp: So we don't have to wait a full month then? <br />Patrick: As far as exposing the asphalt and underneath? <br />Culp: As far as taking it to the next level to get approvals so that we can get working on the <br />outside because if we go into winter we could be into March. <br />Peterson: You'd have to call a special meeting to approve it. <br />Patrick: Yeah, if we had to, we could call a special meeting to approve it. We have done that in <br />the past. <br />Culp: Ok, so once we expose the clapboards then call for someone to come out and review it and <br />make that determination at that time? <br />Sporleder: No, that's not right. I'm sorry, I'm pretty sure you'd have to apply for a C of A to <br />take the existing siding off. <br />Hostetler: No. <br />Sporleder: I don't'see why not, that's changing the exterior and to take the existing siding off <br />and they would need a C of A to do that. <br />Patrick: Not when its done with the view of either restoring the house or seeing if we're going to <br />approve this. <br />Sporleder: Any exterior change to something in the historic district requires a C ofA before they <br />proceed. <br />Herdman: Is that something that could be staff approved? <br />Zeiger: Who's the question to? <br />Herdman: Anybody that knows the answer! <br />Sporleder: Staff could approve it as far as I'm concerned. <br />Riley: Fine by me. <br />Ujdak: Let's hearfrom the counselor. <br />Peterson: If you...you can authorize staff on a motion to approve it if its for the purposes of <br />inspection. To be honest, I do not know answer as far as whether they can remove the current <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.