Laserfiche WebLink
Lynn Patrick: I would like to interject that "Original windows and doors shall be <br />retained, including sashes, lintels; sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and <br />hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim <br />resembling the original." I do not find these windows to be deteriorated beyond repair. <br />Joann Sporleder: But, they are asked to be replaced with material that resembles very <br />closely in terms of scale, size and dimensions the original. <br />Lynn Patrick: But they are not... <br />Joann Sporleder: They are deteriorated beyond repair of using them as insulated <br />windows. They are going to remain single pane windows which are still single pane <br />windows. <br />Tim Klusczinski: I have an issue with the fact that the examples that Professor Enderle <br />sponsors for replacement of the existing openings do not match in full profile with <br />respect especially the sill extension, sill -nose height, as well as the cladding, which would <br />distort them from the original in-kind material suggested by the architecture. It is also <br />speculation, and I would caution everyone, not to suggest that restoration for a single, <br />pane window would not have an extremely beneficial enhancement or provide Professor <br />Enderle with that because it has not been done and we don't know how much is air <br />infiltration and we don't know how much is thermal transfer. With that in mind, that it <br />seems like the most logical approach would be to suggest that since there is still a <br />restoration option, that replacements should not be ordered at this point or allowed and <br />that what can be done to the windows, be done, and then in light of what other <br />mechanical advancements that we have with respect to interior and exterior storms, that <br />those also could be proposed to enhance what I think will be a very cost effective and <br />wonderful solution using single pane glass. <br />Joann Sporleder: I'd like to stress the issue of exterior storms. They simply cannot be <br />allowed. On those windows they would be an historical inaccuracy, there is no indication <br />that those windows at any time in their past have ever had exterior storms or exterior <br />screens. Further, there is no place in the trim of the windows to install them without <br />putting them exteriorly or on top of the existing trim which architecturally is <br />unacceptable. <br />Lynn Patrick: I would like to add to what I hear what Commissioner Sporleder is saying <br />but I also would like to add to what Commissioner Klusczinski said, the possibility of <br />perhaps taking one of the windows and seeing if we could apply one of the solutions that <br />the Preservation Commission is suggesting make a test case out of one of the windows. <br />Joann Sporleder: So far the Commission hasn't suggested anything, except negative <br />comments. <br />Lynn Patrick: I didn't get that... <br />7 <br />