Laserfiche WebLink
because there's nothing here that tells me that these will look exactly like the current do when <br />you get them in. <br />GE: From outside, the frame will remain exactly the same. From inside, we put in the <br />replacement windows, and the color is exactly the same as it is outside. You will not see any <br />change from outside. <br />MC: Are you saying that you're going to leave all of these windows in, and put another window <br />inside it? <br />GE: We keep the frame from outside as it is exactly. And from inside, it's the same... it's a new <br />window but with the same frame and the same square inches. From outside, we don't want to <br />touch anything. <br />JS: Inaudible from mark 796-798 on tape. So what we don't have are the dimensions of the <br />original. The only thing that was not understood here ... (unintelligible)... <br />GE: I really want to guarantee you that from outside; I want the windows and the frame to look <br />exactly as they look now, no changes. And I ... it is very important; I have looked at this house <br />hundreds of times... <br />From mark 807-812 on tape, conversation is inaudible. Those speaking stepped away from <br />their respective microphones. <br />LP: While they're discussing that, for the sake of everyone present, I'd like to point out that the <br />certificate of appropriateness is for a single unit, all wood, aluminum clad exterior ... I think that <br />we have a failure to communicate. <br />AM May I remind the commissioners that no part of that conversation is being recorded for the <br />record? That will make the minutes incomplete. <br />From mark 814-820 on tape, conversation is inaudible. <br />LP: You have three more minutes. <br />From mark 821-826 on tape, conversation is inaudible <br />LP: We are back to our regular portion of our meeting after a brief sidebar. Joann, are you <br />clear, do you have a brief comment? <br />JS: Because of a lack of understanding of the very well presented cross section detail of the <br />window, of the replacement window which has the insulated glass, it would appear that the <br />replacement window, if I understand this drawing correctly, and I'm not sure that I do, that the <br />replacement window would more accurately replicate the appearance of the original window <br />than putting in the storm window. It is quite clear from the drawing that the storm window would <br />involve two things that are not original, in that the width of the current frame would be wider <br />than the original... trails off to inaudible. <br />LP: I would also like to ask Wayne Doolittle our preservation specialist who has been onsite, if <br />you have a brief comment that you'd like to make in this regard. <br />WD: This is a really d ffcult thing to assess, what I would like to see... trails off to inaudible. <br />From mark 842-848 on tape, conversation is inaudible. Cause unknown. <br />LP: We all want a good outcome and I'm looking at the staff report, you have a local landmark, <br />and when you bought it, it was a landmark. And professor you have outstanding credentials, <br />international business, and you are in one of the newest and largest of our historic districts, and <br />the eyes of the preservation world are upon us, and I sincerely want a positive outcome. One that <br />preserves the historic integrity and one that honors you and your commitment to preservation, <br />and yet is compliant to the standards guidelines as written. If there are no further comments... <br />SP: Just from the application its difficult... the question that you're asking the board to do is very <br />difficult with the information in the application doesn't seem to be a concise question, with the <br />n <br />