My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
June 2006
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2006
>
June 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:17 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:12:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001361
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and install treated wood nailer and metal cap if original non-contributing coping tiles too fragile to be <br />removed and replaced. South and East parapet walls termination method will include installation of ter <br />bar below the existing tile with wall anchors to protect terra cotta. Mortar joints between the tiles would <br />be caulked as needed or could be ground and re -mortared. Existing skylights could be removed, the glass <br />reworked as needed and replaced a minimum cost. <br />LOCAL LANDMARK STANDARDS: Group B Standards: B. Treatment. Treatment shall be <br />defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such <br />improvements include re -roofing, glazing ... A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark <br />or its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness. The commission should review the <br />proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. <br />RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. None of the proposed work will alter the style or <br />original form of the Burke Building. The removal of non-contributing tiles and their replacement with <br />painted metal will not be visible from the street. The Contractor, Ingwald Johnson, and the UEA should <br />evaluate the economic feasibility of the skylights and report to the HPC their course of action, as these <br />features are not visible from the street. <br />Chris Dressel of UEA, ( Urban Enterprise Association) is recognized by the Chair to speak on behalf of <br />the project. Mr. Dressel states that the roof repair is necessary to assist his efforts to market the building <br />to potential buyers, which they have been doing since the UEA took ownership of the building in 2004. <br />The issues with the roof are causing damage inside the building, and very much detracting from the <br />overall appearance of the building. Mr. Dressel also states the negotiations with the contractor, Ingwald <br />Johnson (present at meeting) will allow for the matter of the skylights to be addressed once work begins, <br />and also explains that the historically significant features of the architecture including the terracotta and <br />decorative medallions will not be endangered. The skylights, not visible from the street may either be <br />repaired or removed depending on what is determined to be the most prudent course of action. Mr. <br />Dressel reiterates how helpful a proper roof would be to the redevelopment efforts of this property. <br />Mary Jane Chase inquires what the zoning is for the site and what the original configuration of the <br />additional floor of the building is. The second floor of the building was not occupied by the original <br />builders or subsequent owners. The building is currently zoned "Local Business ", which would not allow <br />for residential tenants. <br />Todd Zeiger inquires about downspouts. Mr. Dressel responds that the building has internal drains. <br />Todd emphasizes the importance of having the building occupied or under renovation by winter so that <br />the internal drains in the building don't freeze and cause further damage. <br />Lynn Patrick questions the availability of using the second floor of the building for housing, and the <br />possibility of rezoning. The second floor of the building is subdivided into 16 efficiency apartments. It <br />is the original configuration and is still in tact. Mr. Dressel indicated that the UEA considers every <br />situation differently, and so the UEA would consider pursuing rezoning the location if a potential client <br />wished to utilize the upstairs for rental units. <br />Gerald Ujdak inquires if the skylights leak or if they will be maintained or removed? Mr. Dressel replies <br />that they may not currently be leaking, but have obviously been an issue in the past. No decision has <br />been made yet, but will be based on the recommendation of the contractor when the project reaches that <br />point. <br />Todd Zeiger publicly thanks UEA for taking the lead on the marketing of this building, and for the <br />investment of the roof project. <br />Lynn Patrick requests that UEA provide the HPC with updates regarding this project and the decision <br />regarding the skylights. Mr. Dressel agrees to do so, and thanks the Commission for hearing the CoA. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.