Laserfiche WebLink
they don't have them. To say that they are now, available by email is fine if everybody <br />has email and is informed about that. <br />CATHERINE HOSTETLER: The Chapin Park came in March of 2005 with standards <br />that were approved by the commission in 2002. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: Then why are we still messing around with the standards? <br />CATHERINE HOSTETLER: Because there has been a change of guard so to speak <br />from Pana to the Chapin Park Neighborhood and they wanted to review them. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: I remember reviewing the standards myself last summer. <br />Marking them up and submitting my remarks; but, I still don't see how we can expect <br />someone to follow something that hasn't been approved yet. . <br />CATHERINE HOSTETLER: Everybody got a copy of the standards. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: Well, I don't know that. <br />CATHERINE HOSTETLER: They were -all sent out in September 2004. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: Is there documentation that they were in' fact sent out? <br />CATHERING HOSTETLER: Yes. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: By whom? <br />CATHERINE HOSTETLER: The staff. We had them printed up from Rink. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: Ok and they were mailed. <br />CATHERINE HOSTETLER: Everything was mailed out along with a letter from both <br />the Chapin Park Neighborhood and HPC and then it also had the standards and copy of <br />the proposed boundaries and ordinance. There were three hundred copies mailed out. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: When was that mailed out? <br />CATHERINE HOSTETLER: In September 2004. <br />LYNN PATRICK: And now almost a year later they went ahead and replaced them <br />without first coming for a C of A and without telling Wayne when he was by there <br />talking with them; they led him to believe basically they were going to replace them. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: Because, as I believe they intended to replace them. They <br />were finding difficulty apparently in doing just that. <br />LYNN PATRICK: We can debate that. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: We weren't there. I took those people at their word. They said <br />what their time line on this thing was and I guess I believe what they said.' <br />ALADEAN DEROSE: I would like to offer some legal advice. Though you may be <br />irritated with the owners for not following the rules, you must consider then this C of A <br />now before you without reference to any prior violations and as if the owner had failed to <br />obtain before performing work. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: And with that in mind I will say that if it had come before me <br />without the time line issue and the presentation was made that they made an attempt at <br />replacing them all with the so called Scamozzi capitals; but, they had decided to go a <br />different route, I would have still approved it because the Doric capitals are very <br />appropriate for a Queen Anne structure. If for reasons of economics or structure they <br />found the Doric more amenable to their means, I would have approved it. That's <br />basically why I said what I said initially and that's why I would have approved it; <br />because, it is in keeping with the historical character of the building in which they live in. <br />It is regrettable to lose the Scamozzi capitals; but, they were wrecked and there wasn't <br />any salvaging of the original tops at all. <br />CATHERINE HOSTETLER: They did fix one of them. <br />VA <br />