My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
October 2005
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2005
>
October 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:17 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:12:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001360
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TODD ZEIGER: To say that we're not going to come for another C of A is not <br />necessarily the case. We would absolutely come back for another C of A when there is <br />research done on what was there. <br />JOHN OXIAN: I can't go along with that part of it. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: Is there any indication that the logs on that end where the <br />chimney currently is are all replacement logs or are any of those original logs? <br />TODD ZEIGER: It is a mixture. The cabin has been heavily modified over the past one <br />hundred and seventy-five years. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: The other part that concerns me is the intention in the gable <br />ends of stopping the logs and then building a frame with lap siding. If this cabin were <br />really built in the 1820's, I think that dimension lumber or framing timbers were not <br />readily available, and that would be an anachronism of sorts and probably ought to be <br />looked at very, very carefully before one does something different other then stacking up <br />these logs which admittedly looks a little bit strange. These are probably all replacement <br />logs; because, logs stacked up that way tend to not be very stable. I have some serious <br />doubts as to whether the original cabin would have had a framing piece inside it. <br />TODD ZIEGER: I have no comment. I can't answer the question. All I can tell you is <br />that the cabin expert that was hired to do the analysis on the structure made these <br />recommendations and he bases that on his experience at looking at hundreds of cabins <br />and doing analysis on hundreds of cabins and that was why he was retained. He is one of <br />the experts in the country and so we took his specifications and had them reviewed by the <br />State Historic Preservation Office. They have been signed off by the State Historic <br />Preservation Office, and they have approved [the specs] for release. I am not an expert <br />on cabins and I took Vic Leatherwoods' expertise and turned it into specifications. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: Having recently visited New Salem - I know those are all <br />restored cabins - but they have done a lot of research down there in Illinois on cabins and <br />Lincoln's New Salem. The time frame is the same, the 1830's to the 1850's, when Salem <br />came and went. I don't think there are any framed structures in the gables, but that could <br />be researched. I don't personally care how it's done, but if it's being done with the <br />intention of restoring it to its original condition I think we need to be somewhat more <br />careful about that sort of thing. Unless there is some documentation that framing timbers <br />were available in the 1830's to do what is being proposed, I would suggest that this is an <br />anachronistic addition to the log cabin. <br />JOHN OXIAN: I think there are too many gaps in this and the person who put this <br />together should be here to answer these questions if we are going to be asked to approve <br />this C of A. <br />MARTHA CHOITZ: Is this actually being worked on yet, Todd? <br />TODD ZEIGER: No, we've just released the specifications to begin to start to collect <br />bids. There's some pre-bid meetings set up and there has absolutely been no work <br />started. There hasn't even been a bid yet. We're just in the beginning phases of <br />gathering information and seeking the necessary approvals; the first one was the State <br />Historic Preservation Office because they have funded the grant. They had to be first <br />before we could bring it here and they signed off on. It now it's on this agenda. So we're <br />just working through the process. <br />rl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.