My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
February 2005
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2005
>
February 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:16 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:11:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001360
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT <br />CONCERNING THE LANDMARK FARMHOUSE <br />68286 MIAMI ROAD, UNION TOWNSHIP <br />THE GEORGE SEIFER HOUSE <br />Meeting Date: Thursday, February 17, 2004 @ 9:00 am <br />Those Attending: <br />Wendy Roeder, owner <br />Joann Sporleder <br />Don Sporleder <br />Julie Schutte <br />Purpose: To discuss the possibility of an addition to the rear of the house to fulfill the desires of the owners and <br />to retain as much of the form and structural elements of the historic house as possible. <br />The addition: Owners would like a more accessible first floor bath/utility room with shower, especially after a <br />long day of work on their farm. They would also like it to be accessible for elderly family members. The current <br />first floor bath is small and the farthest room from the entrance of the house. They would also like to expand the <br />kitchen for holiday gatherings and cooking projects; and may want to attach a garage. <br />Proposal: <br />Bathroom: Adapt the small, enclosed porch on the south side of house into the entryway -mud room -utility room - <br />bathroom combination. <br />Assessment: the bathroom/utility room would be much more accessible and tailored to the needs of the family; a <br />two-story structural wall would not need to be touched on the northeast side of the building to expand the existing <br />bath and therefore the cross gable form would not be obscured by the addition and window openings would not be <br />lost; new wall could be placed between existing window and door to provide another operable window for the <br />dining room. This would expose the historic and original form of the cross -gable house, and distinguish the <br />historic portion of the house from the new addition. <br />Kitchen: Expanding the kitchen would require the removal of the shed roof appendage, which is possibly the <br />summer kitchen or portion of an older structure. Staff has not positively identified the date and original use of <br />this portion of the house. The new kitchen could be built extending east from the eastern wing of the cross gable, <br />one story the width of the wing (— 16 feet) with a gabled roof. Two pitches could be used for the roof of the <br />addition: a slope to match the gable of the house or a gentler slope to retain the long second story windows. The <br />interior of the existing kitchen has lovely oak moldings. Staff would recommend reusing this and any other <br />architectural features: stone from the rubble foundation, siding in good condition, windows, etc. <br />Assessment: The house would lose the shed addition but the cross -shaped form of the house would remain intact, <br />and may even be more visible and understandable to the eye. Many more original window openings would <br />remain than in the previous proposal. The addition might also provide the owners with better access to their <br />basement/crawl spaces. <br />Porch: Porch is in need of repair. Rotting rails and spindles could be repaired and strengthened with wood <br />consolidants and epoxies: Abatron was recommended to the owner. Water damage seems to be due to gutters <br />sloping away from the downspouts. <br />Drainase: The house has half -round gutters and in some portions, the drainage systems seem much too complex <br />and drains in the wrong direction. This should be adjusted and then the moisture issues that are causing the <br />peeling paint would be on the way to being solved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.