My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
February 2004
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2004
>
February 2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:16 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:11:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001360
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Feb OG 04 10:08a The Westerly Group, Inc. 812-273-8826 p.2 <br />THE WESTERLY GROUP, Mc. <br />HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS <br />February 4, 2004 <br />To: Karen Hammond -Nash <br />Director, South Bend -St. Joseph County Historic Preservation Commission <br />From: Camille B. Fife and Thomas W. Salmon rl, ASLA <br />Re: noughts ort the WPA masonry at Leeper Park <br />Although we have not revisited the WPA walls at Leeper Park since we completed the <br />Cultural Landscape Report in 1998, and never conducted a detailed condition assessment of <br />this important feature, the following are a few suggestions from our experience with Cultural <br />Landscapes and Leeper Park in particular. <br />General PracticeandProcedure. <br />We have assumed that Pre-ervation is the treatment selected for the WPA sea walls at <br />Leeper Park, especially those around the island. This would be a logical treatment, since it <br />is defined as the "act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain the existing form, <br />integrity and materials of an historic property." I This treatment is appropriate for ongoing <br />maintenance and repair of historic materials and features. It is also appropriate where a <br />historic feature (the walls) will be used for its historic purpose, and where no large scale <br />additions or replacement of features is required for an adaptive use (to make a dock or <br />marina , for example). Since these are the conditions as we understand them, it might be <br />useful to review the methodology which has been developed for this treatment and try to <br />apply it to the present situation. <br />Somekey components of the Preservation treatment include the following: <br />0 The historic use will be retained. <br />0 The historic character will be retained and preserved. <br />0 The property will be recognized as a record of its time, place and use. <br />a Changes which have acquired historic significance will be retained and <br />preserved. <br />0 Distinctive materials, features, finishes, construction techniques and <br />craftsmanship will be retained and preserved. <br />Existing conditions will be evaluated to determine the appropriate level of <br />intervention. - Where the severity of deterioration requires repair or firnited <br />replacement of a distinctive feature, the new material will rnatch the old ire <br />composition, design, color and texture (our italics).2 <br />I Chttrlc% Birnbaum, Christine Capella, Peters, E*d.. M(,Sevrelary qf1lic Inferitir'sSlandardvfitir the Treatincril qC <br />Historic Properties with Guidelines for the Treatment of Cultural ,Landscapes, U. S. Dept of the Interior, NPS. <br />Historic Landscape Initiative. Washington DC, 1996, P. IS. <br />2 Ibid. 11. 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.