Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. John Oxion <br />Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County <br />Re: Oliver Chilled Plow Works <br />Buildings 46 and 47 - Forge 2 <br />March 20, 2002 <br />Page 5 <br />left in the remainder of the joint. Identifying precise locations where the mortar is still sound enough to <br />not require tuckpointing is beyond the scope of this one -day study. Thus, for-the purpose of developing <br />a repair estimate suitable for getting the walls in shape for the building to function as a museum, we <br />have assumed 100% of the exterior masonry will require tuckpointing. If instead, the building is to <br />simply be stabilized and aesthetics are less relevant, we anticipate approximately 1/2 to 2/3 of the two <br />buildings will require tuckpointing. <br />Spalled brick were observed in isolated locations on both buildings. One of the most severe conditions <br />is shown in Photo 31, taken of the parapet in the south elevation of Building 46. A close -up of brick <br />spalling is shown in Photo 32, taken on the south wall of Building 47. Some of the spalled brick do not <br />appear to be original and may be indicative of long term problems. Spalled brick allow water to <br />infiltrate the wall and cause additional deterioration. Severely spalled brick should be cut out and <br />replaced. One source of replacement brick to match the brick on Building 47 is the interior wall shared <br />by the two buildings. <br />The windows in Building 46 are typically operable steel sash as shown in Photo 33. The sash typically <br />appears to be in reasonably .good condition with much of the paint still present as shown in Photo 34. <br />This study assumes all of the steel sash will remain and that all of the glass panes will be replaced and <br />the hardware repaired to make the windows operable. <br />The deterioration of the windows in Building 47 is much more severe. The wood sash windows are <br />typically in poor condition as shown in Photos 35 through 38. Many of the wooden members are <br />missing. Most of the sills have rotted where snow and water did not drain properly. This study assumes <br />all of the wood windows will be replaced with new windows to match the original. <br />Finally, many of the doors on both buildings will have to be reworked. Original metal clad wood doors <br />like those shown in Photo 39 can probably be rehabilitated. Other openings, like that shown in Photo <br />40, will have to be totally reconstructed. <br />REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS AND COST ESTIMATES <br />A summary of our specific repair recommendations for the roof, facade and structural elements of <br />Buildings 46 and 47 is included as Appendices A and B. In conjunction with this study, Ron Radecki <br />provided general specifications for the build out of the museum. His recommendations are included as <br />Appendix C. <br />A budgetary estimate has been prepared by Ziolkowski Construction, Inc. based on the above <br />information. Given the preliminary nature of the study and that they were asked to provide a "budgetary <br />estimate ", they indicate their estimate was conservative in nature. They believe the projected cost of the <br />work would be significantly lower once Design Development drawings are prepared. Their total <br />budgetary estimate of $6.9M also includes approximately $375,000 for site work which we understand <br />would be performed by others. A copy of their estimate is included as Appendix D. <br />