December 2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

5. Add new side entry porch, stair, and ramp on North side of kitchen wing of the house; 6. Build eight foot tall wood fence to North of property; 7. Remove certain large trees; 8. Remove the one of two existing garages that is closer to the house. RECOMMENDATION 1. Regarding the proposed front vestibule, staff can imagine no circumstance in which such a significant alteration to the character defining shape and rhythm of the primary fagade of such a significant and lovely building could be approved by a historic commission. 2. Regarding the proposed canopies, Staff recommends denial of this proposal because the existing shutters are a character defining element of the house, and the existence of both awnings and shutters is conflicting and illogical. Additionally, there is no evidence of such awnings ever having been on this house. Staff notes that canopies similar to the proposed were common on Italianate houses built at the very end of the Victorian Era, but our research finds no evidence of such awnings on any home built during the period of this structure. However, architecture books of the period do recommend louvered shutters (which were also called "Venetian Blinds" in the 19`h Century). This house has had louvered shutters during all the years that we have records of it, though at some point those on the side and back were removed, and those on the front were fixed in place and the hinges apparently removed — though it is also possible that they were always decorative, and never had hinges. The paint on the front of the house and around the other windows obscures the witness marks. 3. Regarding the proposed rear addition: More detailed architectural drawings are necessary for final HPC approval to be granted. However, Staff believes that the building of an addition at this place offers the opportunity to remove some weird and inappropriate alterations to the original milk house or summer kitchen, possibly restoring some of the remaining original out building, while simultaneously giving the new restaurant a great deal of new space. Staff would recommend allowing the rear addition to be either frame or masonry, at the owner's option. The existing kitchen wing on the main house has been extensively remodeled, and part of the exterior has been stuccoed, probably to blend old and newer construction. The existing building immediately behind the kitchen wing, which would have originally been a milk house and/or summer kitchen, has also been extensively altered, in ways which make one wonder what in the name of heaven the builders could have been thinking, but which, fortunately, leave traces of the lovely and interesting original structure. 4. Proposed parking. Staff recommends approval of the proposed parking plan, conditional upon the preservation of the large maple tree and landscape bushes at the North of the house. From the plans submitted, staff believes these landscape elements are intended to be, preserved; however, the plans should be revised to show them. The drawings submitted also show significant alteration of the existing driveways, and removal of a large front yard tree (or two?), though this is not listed in the text of the application. Staff would not recommend approval of such changes, if they are intended to be included in the Application. 5. Proposed new side entry and porch. There are witness marks on the North wall of the kitchen wing and the back wall of the front wing of the house which indicate that there used to be a classic Italianate porch at this location, somewhat smaller that the proposed, but at least twice the size of the presently existing porch. (The existing side porch and the shed - roofed thing on top of the kitchen wing may have been built at the same time.) Staff would