Laserfiche WebLink
3. 1019 S. Michigan—Burke Building <br />Mr. Talley presented the staff report and circulated photographs. Mrs. Sporleder asked what <br />type of stone was on the building. Mr. Ujdak stated that it was Terra Cotta. Mrs. Sporleder <br />noted that the architectural description should stated that the details are Terra Cotta, not stone. <br />There was some discussion over the fact that a Chinese restaurant was once located in this <br />building. Mrs. Choitz moved to send the nomination to the Common Council with a favorable <br />recommendation. Mr. Ujdak seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. <br />4. 802 N. Lafayette—YWCA <br />Mr. Oxian stated that several meetings were held to discuss the landmarking of this structure at <br />which time the Common Council asked that the proposal be tabled until the future of the <br />building can be sorted out. He further recommended that the proposed landmarking of the <br />YWCA be tabled for no more than four months. Mrs. Choitz asked why they wanted to table it. <br />Mr. Oxian stated that the YWCA needed more space then the building could offer and thus, has <br />approached Memorial Hospital as a potential buyer and contributor to their move. He further <br />noted that the Council is not against landmarking, however, they want to help the YWCA by <br />waiting until things become more solidified. There was some discussion over Memorial <br />Hospitals interest in the property. Mrs. Choitz stated that the issue should be tabled for only <br />two months, so that the topic does not drag on indefinitely. She further noted that the <br />Commission needs to be included in all discussions and meetings concerning the future of this <br />building. Mrs. Choitz moved to table the proposed landmarking of the YWCA for two months. <br />Mr. Ujdak seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. <br />5. 115 S. Lafayette—Lafayette/Dean Building <br />Mr. Talley presented the staff report and circulated photographs. He also noted that the owners <br />were in favor of having their building landmarked. There was some discussion over the <br />unsatisfactory conditions and lack of owner responsibility concerning the interior conditions of <br />the building. Mrs. Choitz noted that the deterioration of the interior and lack of basic services <br />has caused a majority of the tenants to leave. There was further discussion over the problems <br />the Adult Probation Office has caused to the overall security of the building. Mr. Ujdak moved <br />to send the proposed landmark to the Common Council with a favorable recommendation. Mrs. <br />Sporleder seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. <br />6.911 S. Michigan—State Bank <br />Mr. Talley presented the staff report and circulated photographs. He further noted that the <br />owners were in favor of the designation. Mrs. Hostetler moved to send the proposed landmark <br />to the Common Council with a favorable recommendation. Mrs. Choitz seconded the motion. <br />The motion passed unanimously. <br />