My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
August 1998
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes and Recordings
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1998
>
August 1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:21 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:09:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001401
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mayor Joseph E. Kernan <br />August 1990 <br />Page Two <br />there exists a variety of types of historic streetlights, including <br />those with round glass globes (in Harter Heights and Park Avenue, <br />primarily), those with a lantern - type fixture, those with decorative <br />concrete poles, and those with decorative cast iron poles. According <br />to Mr. Oxian, the cast iron pole and fixture was original in older <br />city neighborhoods, including the Riverside Drive, and Edgewater <br />Historic Districts and on Park Avenue. Concrete poles were a later <br />addition. <br />The Committee's initial discussions concerned, in part, the <br />relative merits of reconstructing, repairing, and upgrading the <br />existing streetlights, a wholesale replacement of the streetlights, <br />or some sort of combined program. <br />Also discussed was the integrity, or lack thereof, of the <br />streetlighting system on Riverside Drive. Mr. Jim Cartwright, of <br />I &M, indicated his opinion that the wiring of this system was in such <br />poor condition that a total replacement was in order. <br />The Committee decided fairly early in its deliberations to <br />select one (1) or two (2) replacement streetlights for those which <br />were or which later became damaged beyond repair. In an effort to <br />arrive at a consensus, Mr. Michael Meeks, provided the Committee with <br />information on various types of poles, fixtures and lamps (bulbs). <br />Pole Briefly, the Committee considered four types of poles: <br />a cast iron pole, a cast aluminum pole, a concrete pole, and a <br />fiberglass pole. The following chart summarizes the costs and <br />relative merits of the various poles: <br />Cost: <br />Foundation: <br />Paint: <br />Cast Iron <br />$1,000 <br />$ 200 <br />yes <br />Cast Aluminum <br />$ 500 <br />$ 200 <br />no <br />poor <br />Concrete <br />$1,000 <br />n/a <br />no <br />good <br />Fiberqlass <br />$ 700 <br />n/a <br />no <br />fair <br />Durability: -- good <br />Adding to the cost of the cast iron and cast aluminum poles <br />is the fact that neither can be buried directly in the earth, as <br />each requires a poured concrete foundation. Adding to the cost of <br />the decorative concrete pole is the transportation costs, which are <br />not insignificant. A benefit associated with the fiberglass pole, in <br />addition to the fact that it was a direct burial pole, is the fact <br />that it can be installed by one (1) individual, whereas the same is <br />not true of the cast iron and concrete poles. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.