|
I
<br />Mr..... Fine - .. moved - _..that _.. the.. - ". commission ::..approve., ', the ; , application,,,. per,_ Staff
<br />recommendation,,.with the :_addition,,.that_,eyelets will4.,be. installed < .behind . the
<br />parapet_ walls .for support of-temporary-', banners,,. up to.,_eight lights .shall., be „
<br />installed'behind - the metal screen panels_ for illumination of- such banner -
<br />signage, dd,flush metal.acoustic doors shall be installed at existing.openings
<br />in.the - north wall. Mrs. Petrass. seconded the motion._ The motion -passed
<br />_
<br />unanimously.
<br />2. 1998 - 0206 -2 - 520 East Colfax, (LL)-
<br />Mr. Fine„ abstained, himself. from. consideration , of- this, application, ..as an
<br />employe'e_-.of —the, property- - owner.:.Mr. - Duvall...: reviewed-the . discussion . -from the
<br />previous meeting ".,indicating that ,..".the .issues. were. -the- -.same..., for. both_,, this
<br />application .and ....the. ,proposed__.Maoison School,. sign,.. in- that without.. regard ' to
<br />the - ,historic .designations.,,_ the ,proposals _. exceeded _.the sign height and area
<br />allowed in. the respective. -land use districts.' Mr. -F-ine has _i'ndicated that the
<br />owners .would. prefer to present the application unamended and proceed hence to
<br />seek,variance -from the Board of Zoning Appeals to allow -such excess.
<br />He reminded th commission. -that --the application proposed - re -use of ,an.-existing
<br />-sign Ipanel.,"1which. has ..been . removed".. from_ .th¢.:building,,•_on,..,A.:.new Irame..._at...;the
<br />sideyard. - This - would,- ,have. required A very_ close. proximity to-grade. which was
<br />not desirable.
<br />Mr. ...Wiener moved....for approval, of the sign as.. submitted. - .Mrs....,Hostetler
<br />seconded the-motion. The motion-passed unanimously.
<br />3. 1998 -0209 - 804 (832) N. Lafayette B1vd..LL -,
<br />Mr., Duvall,,:. briefly ."reviewed.....the,.,issu�s., identified ,,,in.,- the. -Staff Report -which
<br />were: ._.
<br />1) The same zoning issue as applied to 520 Colfax.
<br />2) Location of the.sign in a area crowded with other landscaping..
<br />He provided a new exhibit prepared „by, the _applicant showing the - sign. -at a
<br />reduced height.. -..and - .located in the yard at _the - corner - ,o,f__,.Park .Lane and.
<br />Lafayette.
<br />Mr.. Fine - -. reported for_ -. the Standards _& Maintenance Committee that they , had .met
<br />with the "'applicant'.s representative-to review the - issues. listed Above. He
<br />added Ghat, -the _committee recommended. ..a _masonry base -be added at -.a - later date-
<br />be iincluded. - in --this. COA. Mr. Fine..moved . -to approve _the application . -per the ._
<br />Staff recommendation._with: the._ Stipulations that _the .new. location be at the.
<br />corner,._of, . Park. .Lane.. & _Lafaye.tte -.and _ that..the,. height.. -.be , reduced_._to. 5 ". 4 ", and
<br />that a brick, base be.-added-at. a, later, date.., to match,-the,,-texture and color of
<br />the school, with a." limestone - cap detail. -Mrs. Hostetler -seconded.,.-the... motion.
<br />The.motion passed unanimously.
<br />IV. Announcements & Miscellaneous Matters
<br />A. Mr -._ Oxian recommended that, identification -. be provided ,,for. HPC members .
<br />and distributed sample ID cards from different departments for comment.
<br />V. Adjournment
<br />The meeting was.adjourned•at 8:15 p.m.
<br />f
<br />
|