July 1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• proposed landscaping as described on the._s-i e pl n w th the exception that the pole light be tabled pending furthe/pecifications Mr. Fine seconded the motion. Fr. Bullene noted that the Sites plan mad -pit vAiffidult to discern the proposed new planting from existin lan �I�ngs due�to�)he labeling. He also suggested that with regard to the post-lamp�fi t thVZere two styles of lamp presently existing on the from and sides of the house which might serve to guide selection of the new fixture. Mr. Oxian indicated that there were several catalogs. of street light fixtures which are appropriate to the period available. The motion was passed unanimously. B. Second Reading of Recommendation for Local Landmark Designation 1. 521 East South Street Mr. Duvall presented the Staff Report and distributed photographs. Mr. Oxian observed that this motion came as a recommendation from the Landmarks committee and therefore need only a second. Mr. Fine seconded the motion. Mr Duvall noted that the owner, Lesley Levitsky was present. Mr. Oxian inquired if she wished to make a presentation. She declined. Mrs. Chiotz noted that Ms. Levitsky had been omitted from the history. The motion was passed unanimously. Mr. Oxian inquired who had sold the property to Ms. Levitsky. She replied that she could not recall .the man's. name but that the property had been acquired with the intention of developing the whole contiguous block which has subsequently been built -out with apartments. 2. Brick Streets T'Mr Oxian directed the attention of the commission to the booklet prepared by • Mr. Talley in connection with this nomination. Mr. Duvall presented the Staff Report. He noted that he had not .prepared. photographs*-- for the streets in question. Mr: Oxian noted that this proposal came to the commission as a committee recommendation & therefore required only a second. Mrs. Choitz seconded the motion. Mr. Oxian noted a discrepancy between the brick sizes described in Mr. Talley's report and the Staff report. Mr. Duvall allowed that this was a typographical error and that the proper dimension should read 3X4X9. Mr. Talley noted .that the sections of street as described in Staff comments were not quite correct. The following corrections were made regarding the locations where the brick pavement is still extant. Lafayette Boulevard should be corrected to read from Marion Street to Bartlett Street and LaMont terrace should be extended to Lafayette Boulevard. Manitou Place from Forrest Avenue to Park avenue also needs to be included. These sections are at some variance to the sections which were originally installed as described in the staff report. Some discussion ensued regarding these- locations and other pavements which radiate off of these. It was concluded that the proposal should read Lafayette Boulevard from Marion Street to Park Lane. Mr. Fine recommended that Staff attach a map to the proposal for the sake of clarity. Mr. Oxian called the question. The motion passed unanimously. IV. Regular Business A. Approval of Minutes 1. May 20, 1996 Mr. Oxian corrected that in discussio • not .stated "unless o9ly the building that the May minutes be approved as motion. The motion passed unanimously. B. Treasurer's Report There was no treasurer's report. n of the North Pumping Station, he had was to be designated". Mr. Fine moved corrected. Mrs. Choitz seconded the