September 1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1992 advising that this property would have a hearing on September 17, 1992 y a Hearing Officer concerning maintenance problems. resent Status: Staff will attend September 17 hearing. 941-943 Riverside Drive -- Riverside Drive LHD Background: Staff received several complaints concerning possible maintenance problems at this property in August. A site visit revealed a general lack of upkeep and a possible hole in the east side of the roof that was allowing access by raccoons. Code Enforcement was notified. Code Enforcement contacted the owner, compiled a substandard housing report on the property and ordered repairs by September 12, 1992. Present Status: The owners' legal counsel (or representative), John Brennan, called HPC staff on September 9, 1992 to state that repairs were underway. Staff asked that a letter be sent to the HPC stating the nature of the repairs to be done. 1071 Riverside Drive -- Riverside Drive LHD Background: (In brief) An inappropriate window was installed by the owners, Mr. Stephen Murphy and Ann Manion, in 1991. The HPC directed that the window either be removed or replaced with an appropriate design. The owners did not comply. to May 15, 1992 the property was deeded to William F. Moran. Repeated etters asking Mr. Moran for compliance have yielded no cooperation. Present Status: The matter was turned over to HPC legal counsel for action on September 3, 1992. 630 West Washington -- Local Landmark Background: Business proprietor, Ms. Lisa Maguire, had a front walk installed without a COA sometime before May, 1992. Staff informed her that she must apply for a COA; owner did not contact staff until, late August, 1992. Owner was given staff approval for the project on August 8, 1992. In May, staff also noticed that a wrought -iron fence was leaning along the brick wall running along the east side of the property. When asked its purpose, Ms. Maguire voiced security concerns -and stated that the fence was a temporary measure. Ms. Maguire was asked to either apply for a COA at that time or to state in writing exactly how long she considered "temporary" to be. Ms. Maguire did not contact HPC staff and was sent a second letter on July 28, 1992. Ms. Maguire contacted the staff on August 7, 1992 and stated that the fence was indeed temporary and, in addition, was not a "permanent I�hange" and probably did not need a COA at all. Xfter further consideration, on September 1, 1992 I wrote to Ms. Maguire stating that I concurred that the fence was not a permanent change (example: if the fence was leaning against the house, it would not need a 2