My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
October 1992
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1992
>
October 1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:25 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:07:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001404
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Staff then recommended to the owners that they install a picket fence at <br />the western edge of the proposed area that can be most easily seen from <br />both Marine Street and Lincolnway East. The owners again felt that this <br />type of fencing would be too expensive. <br />In.light of staff recommendations, the owners offered an alternative: the <br />owners propose to erect one of two types of Schuell-brand fences, <br />constructed of chain-link and wood (see attached examples, "San Lido" and <br />"San Fernando") along the western edge of the property that is parallel to <br />Marine Street; the remainder of the fence would be plain chain-link. (The <br />owners of 1154 LWE, immediately to the west, were given a COA in September, <br />1989 for a Schuell-brand, "San Fernando -style" fence.) <br />Staff recognizes that 1. this fence is not a permanent change to the <br />property_; 2. historic fencing will not be removed; 3. District standards do <br />not specifically prohibit such a fence from being installed, and; 4. at <br />least one similar fence has been approved in the District in the past. <br />It is recommended that the HPC again encourage the owners to install an <br />historically appropriate fence, or install appropriate fencing along the <br />western edge of the property. If they remain opposed, it is recommended <br />that the HPC approve the proposal for the above four reasons. <br />F. Holycross <br />10-14-92 <br />K <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.