June 1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

this regard is equivalent historically to all of the city's schools constructed in the twentieth century. Riley's place in.the built -environment .is of similar status -- it is a good example of its type but with no unusual characteristics in relation to others in the city. Madison Elementary School (804 N. Lafayette) and, especially, Monroe Elementary School (312 E. Donmoyer) are both better examples of the Collegiate Gothic style -- mainly because they have undergone fewer alterations. Of the three, Monroe might be the building best suited to being first targeted to be protected by landmark status. It is an unusually ornate and intact Collegiate Gothic structure; it is the primary example in the city. However, Riley is certainly significant as an important element of its immediate built -environment. Its size and placement adjacent to the Studebaker Golf Course make it an important focal point for the neighborhood. Its demolition, or further defacement of its historical facade, would do irreparable harm to the general environment, or subjective "feel," of the neighborhood. The structure provides an element of grace and beauty that would not be easily replaced. In addition, Riley's historical role as the center of secondary education on the city's southeast side makes it an important element in the social and cultural development of this section of the city. Residents have been graduating from high school here since 1931; the school has served four generations of students; both are important reasons why its possible demolition evokes strong emotional reactions. RECOMMENDATION Riley High School is deserving of protection and preservation -- it is one of many school structures in the city that were constructed of substantial materials, were intended to be up-to-date educational facilities and were designed with a high regard for aesthetics. The building could easily remain useful into the future; landmark designation would in no way impede future exterior additions or interior renovations and would help ensure that the significant portion of the building -- its facade -- would remain as an attractive element of the streetscape. in addition, destruction of a large structure such as this should be discouraged for environmental reasons in addition to cultural and historical concerns. Demolition of this building would only serve to further degrade the environment by adding to landfill overuse. It would be a waste of raw materials -- both those in the building and those needed to build a replacement -- to allow the demolition of a structure that continues to serve useful purposes now and, with the proper care, into the future. The HPC cannot control the use of buildings owned by other government bodies even if landmarked; the School Corporation has an agenda, for instance, that has nothing to do with the preservation of its collection of historic buildings. I suggest a comprehensive study be undertaken that would assess the city's entire collection of historic school_ structures, to be followed by a objective plan for landmarking such buildings in a oil ■