November 1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Page 3 submitted a C. of A. application, which had been staff approved at the recommendation of Mr. Oxi.an, to remove the asphalt shingles from their home to reveal the original clapboard. The application further stated that any deteriorated clapboard would be replaced in-kind'and the entire facade would be stained. The Commission members reviewed the photographs and application. b. C. of A. Procedure Ms. DeRose provided the Commission with a revised C. of A. procedure document. The document changed on1v in a few matters: the statements regarding control of paint color were removed. The notification clause was clarified to indicate compliance with the Open Door Law. and the statement regarding placing stop work orders on a proiect was clar.ifed to indicate that the Building Commissioner is the person who places stop work orders. Ms. DeRose stated that she sent a copy of the proposed procedure to the legal advisor for the Common Council and that. on the advise of. the Council and the City Attorney, she spoke to the Council's legal advisor who stated that the Council had not had the opportunity to review the procedures. She did not expect them to have a problem with them, but suggested that the Commission wait to act upon the procedures until the Council had reviewed them more carefully. Mrs. Sporleder asked, once the procedures are in place. what does the Commission do with them. Ms. DeRose stated that the Commission, through its rule-making authority, would vote on them as its rules and regulations. Thew should then be available at the office of the Commission and should be sent to anvorie who requests them. Mrs. Dixon stated that thev would be sent • initially to all owners residents of local landmarks and properties within local historic districts. Mrs. Sporleder asked if a process had ever been established through the