My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
January 1985
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1985
>
January 1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2019 3:49:11 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:06:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001490
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HISTORIC DISTRICT LIGHTING MEETING <br />Page 2 0 <br />- Mr. McDonald described the current boulevard lighting that I & M has <br />available: a grey or black fiberglass pole about 14' - cost is $200 <br />to $300 whil.e concrete poles are $600 to $700. He said it can be seen <br />at the I & M Service Bldg. at Lathrop St (near the entrances). <br />- What about using better designed lanterns on fiberglass poles? Mr. McDonald <br />said it would not work because of differences in size. <br />- The new fiberglass lanterns are very utilitarian with little attention to <br />quality design and easily damaged. <br />- Mr. McDonald indicated that 1 advantage of the fiberglass poles is that a <br />concrete base is not used thus some of the costs are defrayed. They are <br />simply put into the ground and if knocked over are re -installed. <br />- Mr. Crumlish described a reproduction lamp being installed by the power <br />company in Niagara, N.Y. It is made of polymer. <br />- There is a diversity within the historic districts so that a couple styles <br />of reproductions would be appropriate. Could not several of each style be <br />stock piled to be drawn from as replacements are necessary over the next <br />several years? <br />- The HPC needs information on lighting policies of the City and I & M in <br />order to set up standards for historic districts. How do we seek this <br />information? <br />- Requests for new lighting go to the City but the City has no budget for <br />new installations. <br />- A Riverside resident expressed the commitment of his neighborhood to try <br />to preserve some of our heritage by saving the architecture and ambience of <br />the early 20th century Riverside Drive area. He felt that that could not <br />be accomplished unless it was a City-wide effort. <br />- I & M no longer offers incandescent lighting for new or replacement lampposts. <br />High pressure sodium or mercury vapor are being used. <br />They are attempting to take down old lampposts in areas where there is no <br />concern for them to be able to replace lampposts in historic neighborhoods <br />where there is concern. Ten years ago, whenever I & M took down several <br />lampposts, those were sold. <br />I & M areas - Muncie, Ft. Wayne, Muncie, Benton Harbor. <br />Ft. Wayne historic reproduction - customer -owned and maintained,installed <br />by City Light (now owned by I & M). <br />- Why should established historic neighborhoods which are an economic asset <br />to the City have to pay for their own streetlights in order to have something '40 <br />aesthetically pleasing? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.