Laserfiche WebLink
December 21, 1981 <br />page 2 <br />5. continued <br />g. A memo from the County Board of Commissioners requesting our <br />annual report by January 15, 1982• <br />h. Notice of a Public Hearing from the Mayor on Specialized <br />Transportation System Funds <br />i. Preservation Progress for December, 1981 <br />j. The Old House Journal for December, 1981 <br />k. Building Blocks from the National Center for Urban Ethnic <br />Affairs for Autumn 1981 <br />1. The Preservation News for December of 1981 <br />m. The Indiana Preservationist <br />n. The Southhold Newsletter for December, 1981 <br />o. A request from The American Development Corporation for a <br />list of buildings in the South Bend area which might be <br />rehabilitated. <br />6. Committee Reports <br />a. Budget & Finance <br />1. No Report <br />b. Historic Districts <br />1. Edgewater Place Historic District <br />a) Demolition Requests for 601, 605 and 617 Lincolnway East <br />Ms„ Kiemnec reiterated a conversation with Mr. Friedline, <br />one of the owners of the buildings. He stated that he and <br />Mr. Panzica might be willing to work with the Commission <br />and the two non -profits on moving 601 and might possibly <br />withdraw the application for demolition for that building. <br />He did not feel, however, that 605 & 617 should be saved. <br />He suggested that after the land was cleared, he and his <br />partner would be willing to work with the Commission on <br />design review. Mrs. Price stated that an application for <br />demolition had been made on all four buildings and that the <br />city has awarded a contract on 609. Ms. Kiemnec then read <br />letters about the matter from Southhold Restorations, <br />Southold Heritage and the Edgewater Place Historic District <br />Liaison Committee (Appendices A,'B & C). Mrs. Price <br />stated that all the groups represented, toured the three houses <br />and were not impressed with the integrity of any of the <br />interiors except that of 601. She read from the Ordinance <br />the three reasons why the Council would not grant our stay. <br />She further stated Southold Heritage's doubts that buyers for <br />the three buildings could be found (with the possible <br />exception of 601) because of the large number of houses <br />currently being marketed for removal, the current economic <br />situation and the high cost of moving. Mr. Wasielewski stated <br />