Laserfiche WebLink
Meeting Report <br />Commission <br />City Survey Office <br />Name of Committee Place <br />Persons in attendance <br />Price, Wasielewski, Eckerle, Peck, Crumlish <br />Agenda <br />Further negotiate city contract. <br />Decisions <br />It was agreed - provided the state concurs - <br />9:00 a. M. 6-12-78 <br />Time Date <br />a. Consultant will complete field work in -all load area not already covered, <br />and identify all structures of 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13, and complete a <br />local survey on all superior structures and map all 9 - 13 structures, <br />b, The Commission staff will assist in filling out local cards and will <br />transfer proper information to state cards. <br />c. Consultant will provide 3 photos of all superior structures to meet <br />state needs. <br />d. The Commission, assisted by advice from consultant, will identify all <br />potential local, state, and national districts. The Historic Preservation <br />Commission will also identify individual landmarks of state or national <br />significance. <br />e. The preservation plan will be based on survey, and inventory and devel- <br />oped by Survey/Preservation Plan Committee. <br />f. It would be the intent to publish both city and, county inventory and.plan. <br />These plans and arrangements are contingent on state's willingness to provide <br />$12,000.00 in grant funds and the Historic Preservation Commission to provide <br />staff time to complete_necessary details of completing survey. This m uld <br />include historic research. <br />Action <br />Consultant agreed to speak with Richard Gantz about several technical problems <br />which might occur with the state. The staff is then to seek a state committment <br />with some reasonable time for completion to meet the needs of both the Historic <br />Preservation Commission and State. <br />40 Please attach any pertinent correspondence or other information, <br />Recorded by <br />Date <br />Approved by <br />