My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
January 1977
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1977
>
January 1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:14 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:06:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001359
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
January 31, 1977 <br />Page 3 <br />regarding the increase and remarked that the budget -for' -the' <br />Historic Preservation Commission had not had any increase in <br />three years. Ms. Davisson remarked that the position of the <br />Planner will have some additional duties. It was noted that <br />the Commission was not receiving any budgetary monies from <br />the city, and perhaps Revenue Sharing funds could be utilized. <br />Historic Districts <br />There was no report from this committee. <br />Historic Landmarks <br />Mr. Oxian remarked that part of the $5,400 grant money should <br />be used to purchase some more plaques. He felt that by Aug-' <br />ust or September the Commission should know how many plaques <br />would be given out during this year. These would be for de- <br />signations of county residences. Mr. Smith concurred in this. <br />Mr. Oxian then made an open-ended resolution that by August - <br />15th, the Commission should know how many homes would be de- <br />clared landmarks for purchase of plaques from the $5,000 - <br />grant money and going through ;the proper channels. Mr. Roth- <br />e ermel seconded this motion and it passed unanimously. <br />Union Station <br />Both Mr. Oxian and Ms. Kopezynski talked with the owner of <br />the Union Station. It was noted that the owner was seeking -- <br />funds from the Commission to save the building. It was fur- <br />ther noted that the Union Station has not been declared a <br />landmark, and the owner does not want it declared as such. - <br />It was mentioned that the Commission could declare it a land- <br />mark without the owner's permission. The Commission was in- <br />formed that if it does not take a stand on this issue, the <br />building might very well come down. It was noted that the <br />Historic Preservation Commission does have certain powers <br />and jurisdiction in saving buildings. <br />South Shore <br />This is likewise a jurisdictional action of the Commission. <br />A discussion ensued about the powers of the Commission in <br />this regard, relative to the saving of the passenger service <br />on the South Shore. Mr. Oxian made a motion that the Com- <br />mission write a letter in support of any efforts to save the <br />passenger service. Ms. Davisson seconded this motion and it <br />passed unanimously. <br />Public Relations and Education <br />Ms. Davisson reported that the had received a letter from <br />Judy Studer, Senior Planner of the Area Plan Commission, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.