Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting - October 1, 1993 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) <br />a. continued... <br />discussing redevelopment potential and <br />wanted to make sure the pieces all fit <br />together. They had not asked us for <br />anything other than that. I'm sure they <br />would have come back in under the city <br />ordinance and asked for tax abatement, as a <br />developer would. That's as much as we <br />know about it. We were not part of that <br />process. It was supposed to be a pure, <br />private transaction. <br />JAMES MASTERS: I'm here on behalf of <br />Frank and Tina Polack who are sitting right <br />in front of you, there. Just want to confirm <br />that you got our written remonstrance. <br />MRS. KOLATA: It's right here. <br />MR. MASTERS: I think the remonstrance <br />speaks for itself, but did want to confirm <br />that they object to their property being <br />included in the district. Their property at <br />1010 S. Michigan Street is their home. It's <br />a business office. It's not blighted. It's <br />very well kept up. Frankly, it's hard to <br />determine how this Commission can decide <br />that that property is blighted or that it is <br />needed to acquire that property for any <br />public purpose. Frank, did you want to add <br />anything? <br />FRANK POLACK: No, I choose to withhold <br />any chronological developments, any <br />unpublished departmental procedures until a <br />later date. <br />