My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 05-21-93
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
RM 05-21-93
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 4:18:18 PM
Creation date
10/5/2012 3:26:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting - May 21, 1993 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) <br />a. continued... <br />that section until such time as the State Tax <br />Board gives their approval. Now, I can tell <br />you that we are mounting a major offensive. <br />We already have captains and lieutenants and <br />soldiers prepared to fight this and we're <br />trying to get across to the School Board that <br />there's absolutely no need for this. We have <br />a 55 acre site with a fine school on <br />it— Jackson —that could easily be renovated <br />just as they did with LaSalle School for about <br />$10,000,000. We don't have to float any <br />bond issues and, maybe some of you here are <br />not burdened by the taxes that are imposed <br />upon us, but I can tell you as a business <br />person, that I am burdened; and I know many <br />other people that are burdened. I do not <br />object to it if the money is used properly. <br />But I think, in terms of tearing down this <br />beautiful building.... I should finally tell you <br />that Mishawaka High School —and I invite all <br />of you to come over and look at Mishawaka <br />High School —a beautiful building. Built in <br />1927. We spent $8,500,000 making a major <br />addition to it. Nobody in their right mind <br />would think of tearing that down. You know <br />when Riley High School was built? 1927! <br />Same year. Same basic type of construction. <br />So, I don't want to harangue you, but I do <br />ask that you give some consideration to the <br />idea of modifying your resolution to exclude, <br />until such time as the State Tax Board <br />approves the demolition of Riley and the <br />building of a new building, do not give any <br />aid and comfort to the enemy. And that's, <br />indeed, what you will be doing. You'll be <br />flying directly in the face of what you are <br />-23- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.