My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SM 11-12-91
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
SM 11-12-91
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 4:38:30 PM
Creation date
10/5/2012 10:08:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend edevelopment Commission <br />Special Mee ing - November 12, 1991 <br />6. NEW BUSXNESS (Cont.) <br />b. continued... <br />lopment of this property for our <br />ne <br />We have some 90 - 100 full time <br />employees. We probably do an annual <br />payroll that's in excess of $4,000,000. <br />And I think we are terribly essential to <br />the economy of this community. I think <br />to assist us in the development of our <br />business, to potentially take property <br />that we need to expand our business, is <br />going to add an additional burden of <br />accpiisition and relocation to us, and we <br />really don't need, in a time when our <br />business is thriving, there are others in <br />similar businesses that are on hard <br />times. We just acquired last week a <br />$2,000,000 federal prison job in Terre <br />Haute last month. We have another <br />$2,000,000 state prison job in Carlisle, <br />Indiana. All of which is fueled and <br />managed logistically from South Bend. <br />Obviously, that information is not public <br />knowledge for everybody, but I think it <br />is prudent for the Commission and <br />Redevelopment to assist us. We want to <br />do something with the property that's <br />going to enhance the area. We don't want <br />to do anything that will be a drag on <br />development for future onlookers. What <br />we have proposed, obviously, since we've <br />got a fair corporate headquarters site <br />right now, the centerpiece is not going <br />to be a corporate headquarters. It's <br />going to be basically a warehouse <br />building. It's going to have some 4,000 <br />to 5,000 sq. ft. of office space <br />associated with it, so that we've got <br />things for field operations and some <br />minimal office area. We certainly would <br />want to share those plans with you as <br />they come to fruition. We do not want <br />thiE property placed on the acquisition <br />list because, obviously, if this property <br />is cone, we need to go out and spend our <br />ene gies finding more property. I don't <br />want to go through that exercise. We <br />I n <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.