My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 01-12-90
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
RM 01-12-90
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 5:04:47 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 2:38:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend "velopment CmTatission <br />Regular Mee ing - January 12, 1990 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) <br />c. conoinued... <br />Mr. Nimtz asked if there was objection to <br />adding these items to the agenda. There was <br />no objection and items 6.e. and 6.f were <br />added tc the agenda. <br />d. <br />Mrs. Kolata noted that the staff has been <br />in a period of exclusive negotiations <br />with a hotel developer for these <br />properties on Washington Street between <br />Micbigan Street and St. Joseph Street. <br />We bad asked the developer to upgrade the <br />quality of the exterior material from a <br />Dryvit type material to brick, marble or <br />similar material. The staff is concerned <br />that Dryvit does not have an established <br />track record in this climate. <br />Mrs. Kolata noted that we have had <br />difficulty reaching the developer for a <br />response. In the contacts we were able <br />to make, the developer indicated that <br />they have not been able to come up with a <br />proposal that eliminates Dryvit and is <br />still affordable to them. They currently <br />have a proposal that is 40% brick and 60% <br />Dryvit. However, they are still looking <br />at other alternatives. Mrs. Kolata <br />responded that the 60% Dryvit was still <br />not satisfactory to the Commission. She <br />also pointed out that the 60-day period <br />of eKcIusive negotiations had lapsed and <br />been extended. We have left several <br />phona messages but were only able to <br />reaci one principal late yesterday. <br />Basel on that conversation, we telefaxed <br />a le to them early this morning <br />stating that the staff intended to <br />recomiend that the exclusive negotiations <br />not biee extended since it does not appear <br />that they can change the exterior and <br />upgr%de the quality of the building. <br />I Me <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.