My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 12-22-89
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
RM 12-22-89
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 2:10:54 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 1:35:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend evelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting - December 22, 1989 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) <br />a. contu.nuea... <br />they would like to have the entire <br />for of brick, granite, marble, or <br />some comparable material. The developer <br />is considering the staff's suggestions <br />and we hope to hear from them next week. <br />Mrs. Kolata noted that the developer has <br />changed their proposal significantly to <br />conf rm to the requests of the staff. <br />The original suburban appearance with <br />exteisive surface parking and an outdoor <br />ning pool has been changed to limited <br />surf ce parking and a possible contract <br />with a health club. <br />She Lsked the Commission for permission <br />to ntinue negotiations with them and <br />repo back at the January 2, 1990 <br />Orga 'zational Meeting. <br />Mr. Miasecki asked about the drivet <br />exte for of the building at Colfax and <br />Main Mrs. Kolata responded that several <br />prof have been proposed using drivet, <br />but a Design Guidelines for the <br />downlimm do not address the material. <br />changes to the Design Guidelines <br />were considered at a Design Review <br />ttee meeting on December 21st. It <br />was the staff recommendation that drivet <br />not le a first choice material for new <br />cons ction, but could be used for <br />That change was not approved by <br />the Conmttee. The Committee generally <br />agreEd with the staff recanwndation, but <br />wantod to handle each project involving <br />driv t on a case by case basis. <br />W. pfle explained that the building <br />at Min and Colfax was an exceptional <br />case and drivet was chosen for the <br />exterior as a last resort. <br />Mrs. <br /><blata noted that the Cc m u scion is <br />meted in the quality of the proposed <br />as it relates to the prime site and <br />feel that the material is suited <br />it location. <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.