Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend <br />Regular Me( <br />6. NEW BM <br />a. Cor <br />7. <br />elopment Commission <br />- Mash 10, 1989 <br />(Cont.) <br />in the same building. R.E. <br />.oskey and Jerome Michaels would each <br />age $200 for a vacant lot, $300 for a <br />rle family residence and $900 for a <br />:i- family residence. Although they <br />mated the mix of units differently, <br />x unit price was the same. Ralph <br />er's estimate was provided per block <br />totalled $25,050, which was more than <br />per unit estimate of the other three <br />Kolata suggested accepting the <br />Hoover Appraisal Service proposals and <br />di. iding the work of the second appraisal <br />between R.E. McCloskey and Jerome <br />Midhaels since their costs were <br />by <br />12 <br />MS. I <br />Park <br />that <br />� a motion by Mr. Piasecki, seconded <br />[r. Combs and unanimously carried, the <br />d.ssion accepted the proposal of <br />er Appraisal Service for appraisal <br />: in the Monroe Park portion of the <br />h Bend Central Development Area and <br />orized the staff to divide the work <br />the second set of appraisals between <br />McCloskey and Jerome E. Michaels, <br />.ingent upon their keeping the unit <br />e quoted in their proposals and each <br />leting the work within 60 days. <br />n asked if the new homes in Monroe <br />complete. Mrs. Kolata responded <br />interior was nearly finished. <br />Mr. Than Howell asked if the Commission <br />intendel to rehab the Monroe Park hares it <br />wants t acquire. Mrs. Kolata responded that <br />the int mt is to assemble land for <br />multi -f mily housing, so demolition would be <br />-4- <br />•• 1 1 • MCI' �� 1 • -• •• <br />r � •- 1�1 r •- r <br />DUN DPW CC44 C461-:1 • r a�- • 1 <br />I r- �:lal- r I • • <br />