My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 07-24-87
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
RM 07-24-87
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 2:59:17 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 9:31:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend f <br />Regular Meet <br />4. COMMUNI( <br />a. Cont <br />Dear <br />As c <br />fins <br />Sout <br />dowr <br />fury <br />our <br />elopment Commission <br />- July 24, 1987 <br />NS (Cont.) <br />Commissioners: <br />this date, we have not completed <br />cial arrangements for 402 -404 E. <br />Street. We have not been turned <br />for a loan, but merely required to <br />sh more information and additions to <br />usiness plan. Our delay at the <br />t is related to vacations of the <br />e involved. <br />We have contracted with Edward VanRyn to <br />proceed with the architectural plans for <br />your approval. Mr. VanRyn is in <br />agreement with us on our ideas and has <br />expressed a real interest and concern for <br />maintaining the integrity of the <br />built ing. <br />Once again, we are most anxious to <br />proceed with this project. We request <br />your patience in order that we are able <br />to get the necessary funds to do the <br />"job" right. <br />Sin c rely, <br />San :a P. Kieffer <br />5. OLD <br />a. Commission authorization requested to <br />con act for design services in the South <br />Bend Central Development Area. <br />Mr. Hunt noted that there were three <br />respDnses to the request for proposals <br />for Burvey and design work for the Niles <br />Aven e improvements. One of the <br />pro .sals was not signed and, therefore, <br />coula not be considered. Ms. Matthews <br />explFtined that Michael Meeks from the <br />Depa tment of Engineering had reviewed <br />the --wo acceptable proposals and <br />inte iewed representatives from the <br />fi to accurately evaluate the <br />pro sals. Based on the interviews, it <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.