My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 03-22-85
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
RM 03-22-85
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 3:29:02 PM
Creation date
9/28/2012 3:50:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend edevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting - March 22, 1985 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) <br />7. <br />b. Continued... <br />being resolved privately by the individuals. <br />The contract is being rebid to obtain a new <br />con ractor to complete the contract. <br />Upon a motion made by Ms. Auburn, seconded by <br />Mr. Combs and unanimously carried, the <br />Co 'ssion approved a proposal in connection <br />wi the Section 312 Loan Program as listed <br />abo e. <br />Mr. Hun reported that bids for the L. Keen <br />Building in Monroe Park will be received and <br />opened on March 25, 1985 at 10:00 a.m. The <br />schedule for bid presentations to the staff <br />and Cominission will tentatively be held April <br />12th. A staff recommendation on the bid award <br />is targ ted for April 26, 1985. <br />The TRARSPO issue was brought up for general <br />discussion by the media representatives and <br />general public present at the meeting. Mr. <br />Nimtz commented that the Redevelopment <br />Commission is communicating and negotiating <br />with al the parties concerned about the <br />locatio of TRANSPO in order to find for the <br />best too Bible solution. <br />Ms. Sch artz stated that a notice of default <br />was sent to TRANSPO last summer. <br />Mrs. Janet Allen raised a question on <br />TRANSPO's default with the Redevelopment <br />Commission and TRANSPO's possible loss of <br />federal funding for the project. <br />Mr. Hunt explained that the problem arose <br />because TRANSPO changed the design and scale <br />of the proposed project without consulting <br />with the Redevelopment Commission. There also <br />was an greement reached on a timetable for <br />state oE construction of the project. The <br />lapse oE time on development is a technical <br />default of the agreement between the <br />Connniss'on and TRANSPO. Mr. Hunt stated that <br />TRANSPO has never represented to the <br />Commisson that they had a loss of federal <br />funding i for the project. <br />-4- <br />COMMISSION APPROVED A <br />PROPOSAL IN CONNECTION WITH <br />THE SECTION 312 LOAN PROGRAM <br />AS LISTED ABOVE <br />PROGRESS REPORTS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.